Re: Precision about interface address determination in pf.conf(5)

* Olivier Mehani [2009-08-14 14:45]: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 05:31:39PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote: > > > I'm suspecting that syntax b(interface)b in pf.conf only > > > resolves to the IPv4 addresses of the interface. > > wrong. > > Right, thanks for this terse answer Henning (: > > I investi

Re: Precision about interface address determination in pf.conf(5)

On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 05:31:39PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote: > > I'm suspecting that syntax b(interface)b in pf.conf only > > resolves to the IPv4 addresses of the interface. > wrong. Right, thanks for this terse answer Henning (: I investigated further, and found the cause of my problems to

Re: Precision about interface address determination in pf.conf(5)

* Olivier Mehani [2009-08-13 17:28]: > I'm > suspecting that syntax b(interface)b in pf.conf only resolves to the > IPv4 addresses of the interface. wrong. -- Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org BS Web Services, http://bsws.de Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Servi

Precision about interface address determination in pf.conf(5)

Hello list, I read in pf.conf(5), bWhen the interface name is surrounded by parentheses, the rule is automatically updated whenever the interface changes its address.b I know this works well for IPv4 addresses, where b(sis0)b will resolve to the addresses of sis0. However, I'm working on an