Also missing the target could be enough ironic:
- about bloated html and js ask GitHub;
- about the security of /tmp ask Theo.
Anyway consider to download Tiny Tools from https://bsdload.com
-- Nowarez Market
Nov 22, 2023 12:08:36 Crystal Kolipe :
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 11:44:12AM +0100, N
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 11:44:12AM +0100, Nowarez Market wrote:
> https://github.com/par7133/tiny-tools
There is something ironic about having to download 204345 bytes of bloated
html and javascript just to get the 170 bytes of source code for 'checkmd5'.
But anyway, one improvement you could mak
Just made an addition to Tiny Tools for OpenBSD:
checkmd5, an md5 checksum utility
check256, a sha256 checksum utility
You can find it here:
https://github.com/par7133/tiny-tools
== Nowarez Market
hello,
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 07:22:57PM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> > I the same mood: I realized recently that no implementation of awk
> > seems to implement quantifiers which is really desapointing.
> Awk uses EREs, so if by quantifiers you mean {n,m}, then awk most
> certainly suppo
Marc Chantreux:
> I the same mood: I realized recently that no implementation of awk
> seems to implement quantifiers which is really desapointing.
Awk uses EREs, so if by quantifiers you mean {n,m}, then awk most
certainly supports this.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber
On Tuesday, November 14, 2023, Daniele B. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I got inspired by the Tiny Tools article, by Gerald J. Holzmann, with some
> useful shell tools code for coding on Unix-like systems.
>
> The article is severals years old (jan 2016) and code should be adapted to
> OpebBSD. But I'm try
hello,
> but note that BREs are not a strict subset of EREs
I have to admit that's the way I saw BRE so thanks a lot for noticing me.
I the same mood: I realized recently that no implementation of awk
seems to implement quantifiers which is really desapointing.
I don't realize those things that
Marc Chantreux:
> But is there another good reason for BRE to be still alive?
> (perfomance, simplicity, or anything else).
I think it is mostly for historical reasons, but note that BREs are
not a strict subset of EREs: BREs allow back-references, EREs do
not.
The GNU project turned BREs and ER
Just made an addition to Tiny Tools for OpenBSD, regextr - a reg
expression facilitator for everyone.
It is curious because anyone can customize it with its own abstract
syntax.
Furthermore it can be used yet to compose expressions like:
wiz$ echo lol | pcregrep "`./regextr cap capname text /
hello,
> these tools by default use basic regexps (BRE).
Out of curiosity:
To me, it's just a reason of retrocompat: no people dare breaking
everything at some point. I really dislike the fact that it's
confusing (for example: + must be protected but not *).
But is there another good reason fo
Ok received, thanks.
Omar Polo wrote:
> On 2023/11/15 16:13:04 +0100, "Daniele B." wrote:
> > Testing regex for these "tiny tools" I noticed that both sed and
> > grep have a limited support for regex syntax. In the case of grep I
> > had to revert to pcregrep to get something better.
>
> t
On 2023/11/15 16:13:04 +0100, "Daniele B." wrote:
> Testing regex for these "tiny tools" I noticed that both sed and grep have a
> limited
> support for regex syntax. In the case of grep I had to revert to pcregrep to
> get something
> better.
these tools by default use basic regexps (BRE). Yo
Testing regex for these "tiny tools" I noticed that both sed and grep have a
limited
support for regex syntax. In the case of grep I had to revert to pcregrep to
get something
better.
-- Daniele Bonini
Nov 14, 2023 23:52:01 Daniele B. :
> Daniele B. :
>
>> You can find the first of these shel
Daniele B. :
> You can find the first of these shell tools, "nana" (my daughter chinese name
> that in italian means 'short female') resembling and
> enanching the original tool "num". It is here on https://bsdload.com
I just finish to convert the most of them adding the following tools:
- fun (
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 02:34:27PM +0100, Omar Polo wrote:
> On 2023/11/14 08:19:11 -0300, Crystal Kolipe
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 11:43:14AM +0100, Daniele B. wrote:
> > > enanching the original tool "num".
>
> I haven't read the previous linked stuff but
>
> > /bin/cat already has
I'm not sure your call is directed to me. But I take it like a compliment
if this stuff is inspirational for you too.
Indeed, cat miss an -o for line offset.
Putting my hands on OpenBSD development will require
a lot of time and effort, upgrade of my stick to current and dev tools,
C refresh with
On 2023/11/14 08:19:11 -0300, Crystal Kolipe wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 11:43:14AM +0100, Daniele B. wrote:
> > enanching the original tool "num".
I haven't read the previous linked stuff but
> /bin/cat already has the -c option to number lines, although it always starts
> numbering at 1.
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 11:43:14AM +0100, Daniele B. wrote:
> enanching the original tool "num".
/bin/cat already has the -c option to number lines, although it always starts
numbering at 1.
Wouldn't it be more useful to add the functionality to start numbering at a
certain offset to /bin/cat by
Hello,
I got inspired by the Tiny Tools article, by Gerald J. Holzmann, with some
useful shell tools code for coding on Unix-like systems.
The article is severals years old (jan 2016) and code should be adapted to
OpebBSD. But I'm trying to convert them anyway.
You can find the first of these
19 matches
Mail list logo
