Argh! - besides everything what jmc@ said, it should have been
the following diff *for sure*:
diff --git a/sbin/dhclient/dhclient.8 b/sbin/dhclient/dhclient.8
index 9d77c7e..b6094c1 100644
--- a/sbin/dhclient/dhclient.8
+++ b/sbin/dhclient/dhclient.8
@@ -57,6 +57,16 @@ The name of the network inte
Jason McIntyre wrote [2011-10-22 16:24+0200]:
> i will look at it. but i'm pretty sure we won;t want that.
>
> jmc
Thanks for looking at *that* anyway!
It was the wrong source diff from somewhere in between.
I can't comment on 'egress' otherwise.
ifconfig.8 talks about default route(s), and get
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 03:24:42PM +0200, Steffen Daode Nurpmeso wrote:
> Ciao,
>
> 49.html states:
>
> dhclient(8) now accepts 'egress' as an interface name, meaning
> whichever interface is marked as being in the 'egress' group.
>
> but the manual page doesn't mention it.
i'm not a fa
Hello again,
ok and while i did the patches i'm replying to, i did't
understand: the code seems to be a real nifty automatic deduction
of configuration data which is made available somewhere else
(ifconfig(8)).
It may be stupid, useless etc.
The appended diff implements a '=GROUPNAME' command lin
Ciao,
49.html states:
dhclient(8) now accepts 'egress' as an interface name, meaning
whichever interface is marked as being in the 'egress' group.
but the manual page doesn't mention it.
Also it seems to me that dhclient.c:get_ifname() uses an error()
call with a %m format without any er
5 matches
Mail list logo
