On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:27:21 +0700, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
* Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-28 03:57]:
What am I overlooking here ? - I have been doing like this for the last
years, no problem. Today there is:
# patch -p0 < 004_pf.patch
|--- pf.c 18 Nov 20
* Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-28 03:57]:
> What am I overlooking here ? - I have been doing like this for the last
> years, no problem. Today there is:
>> # patch -p0 < 004_pf.patch
>> |--- pf.c 18 Nov 2007 21:53:47 - 1.564
>> |+++ pf.c 22 Nov 2007 02:01:46 -
Gordon Stratton wrote:
One way you can solve this is by moving the patch to
/usr/src/sys/net
before applying it, the patch lists pf.c with no directories leading up to
the filename
Yes, and you have to cd into it. Otherwise it still won't work.
Someone might want to change the instructions i
On Nov 27, 2007 5:34 PM, Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So where is my mistake, please ?
One way you can solve this is by moving the patch to
/usr/src/sys/net
before applying it, the patch lists pf.c with no directories leading up to
the filename (probably unlike the other patches you a
What am I overlooking here ? - I have been doing like this for the last
years, no problem. Today there is:
# cd /usr/src
# ls -l 004_pf.patch
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wsrc 1303 Nov 27 17:32 004_pf.patch
# patch -p0 < 004_pf.patch
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to thi
5 matches
Mail list logo