On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Long Wind wrote:
> Thank STeve Andre' I use script method
>
> I probably will disappoint Ingo Schwarze, perhaps it's not really
> error, but it made me feel uneasy:
>
> Error from
> http://ftp.sunet.se/pub/os/OpenBSD/5.5/packages/i386/quirks-1.113.tgz
> Redirecte
Thank STeve Andre' I use script method
I probably will disappoint Ingo Schwarze, perhaps it's not really
error, but it made me feel uneasy:
Error from http://ftp.sunet.se/pub/os/OpenBSD/5.5/packages/i386/quirks-1.113.tgz
Redirected to
http://211.167.105.78:82/1Q2W3E4R5T6Y7U8I9O0P1Z2X3C4V5B/ftp.
Hi,
Long Wind wrote on Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 07:27:09AM +0800:
> how to direct ouput by a command to file (so I can report error here)
>
> pkg_add nedit > t1
>
> doesn't work
That only catches standard output, not standard error.
Both of the following should work:
$ pkg_add nedit > t1 2>&1
how to direct ouput by a command to file (so I can report error here)
pkg_add nedit > t1
doesn't work
Thanks!
On 08/02/14 07:17, Gustav Fransson Nyvell wrote:
On 08/02/14 13:13, Gustav Fransson Nyvell wrote:
On 08/02/14 12:54, Marc Espie wrote:
On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 12:26:06PM +0200, Gustav Fransson Nyvell wrote:
Hi, there,
I wanted to run something by you, mkay. About package management. I
wonder
The need for multiple versions of an application on one machine
doesn't manifest that often. Asking the system to tie itself into
knots for this purpose is likely to result in bloat, convolution and
less reliability.
Some contexts support and indeed encourage the notion of many
versions. For insta
On 08/02/14 06:25, Gustav Fransson Nyvell wrote:
> Hi, there,
>
> I wanted to run something by you, mkay. About package management. I
> wonder if this has been shouted at already. I remember from SunOS that
> packages are installed in a different manner than let's say Red Hat and
> of course Op
On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 01:13:56PM +0200, Gustav Fransson Nyvell wrote:
> entirely different is needed? Okay, maybe I should complain about the status
> quo... thing is when packages install in /var, /usr, /etc and /opt they're
> so spread out it's hard to know what is what. This might be because I
On 08/02/14 13:13, Gustav Fransson Nyvell wrote:
On 08/02/14 12:54, Marc Espie wrote:
On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 12:26:06PM +0200, Gustav Fransson Nyvell wrote:
Hi, there,
I wanted to run something by you, mkay. About package management. I
wonder
if this has been shouted at already. I remember f
On 08/02/14 12:54, Marc Espie wrote:
On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 12:26:06PM +0200, Gustav Fransson Nyvell wrote:
Hi, there,
I wanted to run something by you, mkay. About package management. I wonder
if this has been shouted at already. I remember from SunOS that packages are
installed in a differen
On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 12:26:06PM +0200, Gustav Fransson Nyvell wrote:
> Hi, there,
>
> I wanted to run something by you, mkay. About package management. I wonder
> if this has been shouted at already. I remember from SunOS that packages are
> installed in a different manner than let's say Red Ha
Hi, there,
I wanted to run something by you, mkay. About package management. I
wonder if this has been shouted at already. I remember from SunOS that
packages are installed in a different manner than let's say Red Hat and
of course OpenBSD. They install it in the form /pkgs/PROGRAM/VERSION,
e
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 09:58:20AM -0400, Will H. Backman wrote:
> Shouldn't it suggest what packages to update because of a newer version?
pkg_add -u doesn't have a notion of `newer version'. It stops at `this is
the package whose name most closely matches your existing package'.
It matches the
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc Espie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 11:31 AM
> To: Will H. Backman
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: package installation script hints
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 09:58:20AM -0400, Will H. Backman wr
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc Espie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 9:39 AM
> To: Will H. Backman
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: package installation script hints
>
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 09:28:04AM -0400, Will H. Backma
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 09:28:04AM -0400, Will H. Backman wrote:
> >
> > > 2 - How is pkg_add -u working for people?
> >
> > It works fine for me. I don't know about other people yet, you tell
> me...
>
> Aug 24 snapshot, trying just "pkg_add -u" causes it to say updating
> package -> package fo
> > 2 - How is pkg_add -u working for people?
>
> It works fine for me. I don't know about other people yet, you tell
me...
Aug 24 snapshot, trying just "pkg_add -u" causes it to say updating
package -> package for every single one of my installed packages, and it
then asks me to run pkg_add -r f
Paul de Weerd wrote:
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 12:06:29AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
| > 2 - How is pkg_add -u working for people?
|
| It works fine for me. I don't know about other people yet, you tell me...
I haven't used it very much yet, but so far everything works great for
me. But this is ju
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 12:06:29AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
| > 2 - How is pkg_add -u working for people?
|
| It works fine for me. I don't know about other people yet, you tell me...
I haven't used it very much yet, but so far everything works great for
me. But this is just basic pkg_add -u/pkg_
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 10:08:53AM -0400, Will H. Backman wrote:
> 1 - If the new host happens to have one of those packages installed,
> perhaps because I stopped the installation of packages the first time,
> then pkg_add will stop when it hits an already installed package. I can
> fix that with
> -Original Message-
> From: Marc Espie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 6:43 PM
> To: Will H. Backman
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: package installation script hints
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 04:35:13PM -0400, Will H. Backma
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 04:35:13PM -0400, Will H. Backman wrote:
> 1. Packages get installed in a sub-optimal order. Quite often one
> package on the list will have already been installed as a dependency. I
> think my script downloads the redundant package before deciding that it
> was already in
I'm looking for hints and criticism for a package installation script.
I do a full install, and then install a set of packages.
To get the list of packages to install on another machine, I just
grabbed a directory listing from /var/db/pkg, put them in my script, and
then run that script on a
Qv6 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) dixit:
> Folks:
>
> Brand new to openbsd.
Brand new to *nix too?
> #PKG_PATH=ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OPENBSD/3.7/packages/i386/
(...)
> ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OPENBSD/3.7/packages/i386/snort-2.1.2.tgz
The issue is that OpenBSD is not the same as OPENBSD.
--
|---
Thanks all!
> s/OPENBSD/OpenBSD/
Could you show us the output of "env" for both shells?
Jasper
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:23:58 -0500
Qv6 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Folks:
>
> Brand new to openbsd.
>
> Just installed obsd without any of the X sets, game*, or bsd.mp
> installed, on an intel pc. Every seems to be on the up and
Qv6 wrote:
Folks:
Brand new to openbsd.
Just installed obsd without any of the X sets, game*, or bsd.mp
installed, on an intel pc. Every seems to be on the up and up except
that installing packges gives a fatal error, and there is nothing in
the log files to tell me anything about this part
On Friday 24 June 2005 09:23 am, Qv6 wrote:
> Folks:
>
>
> Here are the steps I took:
>
> #PKG_PATH=ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OPENBSD/3.7/packages/i386/
> #export PKG_PATH
> #
Never mind folks.
I found out the cause: PKG_PATH was not properly defined.
here is the original PKG_PATH definition
Folks:
Brand new to openbsd.
Just installed obsd without any of the X sets, game*, or bsd.mp
installed, on an intel pc. Every seems to be on the up and up except
that installing packges gives a fatal error, and there is nothing in
the log files to tell me anything about this particular error.
29 matches
Mail list logo
