On 29/09/2016 02:28, Joe Holden wrote:
You can achieve full sized frames via pppoe in that case, mtu 1508 on the re
interface facing the modem, mtu 1500 in the pppoe config. Will negate the
need for nasty scrubbing which doesn't always prevent problems anyway.
awesome, now set as per the man p
Hi, thanks for replying
On 28/09/2016 15:20, Stuart Henderson wrote:
No baby jumbos with rl(4) so you are stuck with 1492 MTU, so you need
PF so you can do "scrub (max-mss 1440)" as described in pppoe(4)'s
"MTU/MSS ISSUES" section.
I was mistaken. These are re not rl. How does this alter thin
On 2016-09-28, tech-lists wrote:
> Hello misc@
>
> Hoping someone can help me please. I have a bit of a chicken and egg
> situation with regard to routing real IPs through a PPPoE connection in
> that I know some of the terms but my understanding is limited on others.
> I've read around pppoe o
Hello misc@
Hoping someone can help me please. I have a bit of a chicken and egg
situation with regard to routing real IPs through a PPPoE connection in
that I know some of the terms but my understanding is limited on others.
I've read around pppoe on freebsd and openbsd and openbsd seems to m
4 matches
Mail list logo