On 2020-09-21, open...@kene.nu wrote:
>> > My basic ruleset snippet:
>> > pass quick on vlan100 from any to any
>> > match out on vlan200 nat-to vlan200
>> > pass out on vlan200
>> > block out quick on vlan200 from
>>
>> If this is your actual ruleset, you are observing the intended behavior.
>>
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 02:14:25PM +0200, open...@kene.nu wrote:
> > > can find online seems to suggest otherwise.
> >
> > It would be interesting to hear which shreds of information you found.
> >
> Mainly this which I see now contradicts itself.
> https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/nat-filtering-
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 1:39 PM Peter N. M. Hansteen
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 12:46:15PM +0200, open...@kene.nu wrote:
>
> > I am seeing what could be expected behaviour but the small shreds of
> info I
> > can find online seems to suggest otherwise.
>
> It would be interesting to hear wh
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 12:46:15PM +0200, open...@kene.nu wrote:
> I am seeing what could be expected behaviour but the small shreds of info I
> can find online seems to suggest otherwise.
It would be interesting to hear which shreds of information you found.
>
> I have a box that acts as a ro
Hello,
I am seeing what could be expected behaviour but the small shreds of info I
can find online seems to suggest otherwise.
I have a box that acts as a router and firewall. It forwards packets from
the internal lan (call it vlan100) and sends it natted out on the external
lan (call it vlan200)
5 matches
Mail list logo
