On 02/12/2008, at 11:11 PM, Insan Praja SW wrote:
On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:17:42 +0700, David Gwynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi,
Here the dmesg attach after compiling the source. It works just fine
but I
can't change em(4) MTU over 1600.
thanks for testing the diff.
not all em(4) adapte
On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:17:42 +0700, David Gwynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Here the dmesg attach after compiling the source. It works just fine but I
can't change em(4) MTU over 1600.
$ sudo ifconfig em0 mtu 1514
ifconfig: SIOCSIFMTU: Invalid argument
$ sudo ifconfig re0 mtu 1600
Thanks,
In
On 02/12/2008, at 15:51, "Insan Praja SW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:17:42 +0700, David Gwynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
hi,
can you please try this diff and see if it solves your panics?
Hi David and Misc@,
I already use the rev1.199 source code which back out th
On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:17:42 +0700, David Gwynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi,
can you please try this diff and see if it solves your panics?
Hi David and Misc@,
I already use the rev1.199 source code which back out the 1.197 source
code. But I'm going to give it a try on a non-production
hi,
can you please try this diff and see if it solves your panics?
Index: if_em.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_em.c,v
retrieving revision 1.199
diff -u -p -r1.199 if_em.c
--- if_em.c 29 Nov 2008 10:23:29 - 1.199
Hi Misc@ and Stuart,
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 17:06:59 +0700, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
In gmane.os.openbsd.misc, you wrote:
If there's any diffs for the driver?
this backs out the commit which will have caused the problems
you saw and should restore it to working behaviour.
On 2008-11-28, Insan Praja SW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 02:38:33 +0700, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2008-11-27, Insan Praja SW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> em0 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82573E)" rev 0x03: irq
>>> 9, address 00
Hi,
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 02:38:33 +0700, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 2008-11-27, Insan Praja SW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
em0 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82573E)" rev 0x03: irq
9, address 00:15:17:49:03:b3
em1 at pci4 dev 1 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82540
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 02:38:33 +0700, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On 2008-11-27, Insan Praja SW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
em0 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82573E)" rev 0x03: irq
9, address 00:15:17:49:03:b3
em1 at pci4 dev 1 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82540EM
On 2008-11-27, Insan Praja SW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> em0 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82573E)" rev 0x03: irq 9,
> address 00:15:17:49:03:b3
> em1 at pci4 dev 1 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82540EM)" rev 0x02: irq 11,
> address 00:07:e9:0f:44:ac
> em2 at pci4 dev 5 function 0
Hi Misc@,
I'm compiling a 27 November source tree, kernel and userland. Just as it
finished booting, it went panic. I got 25 November kernel and userland
which works just fine. Thanks.
Here it comes,
OpenBSD 4.4-current (GENERIC) #48: Thu Nov 27 16:20:26 WIT 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/
11 matches
Mail list logo