Hi
Sorry for the double, but i have forgotten the kroute.c in my diff, then
i cannot work :)
Have a nice day
--- old/usr.sbin/ospfd/kroute.c 2011-11-15 05:17:46.0 +0100
+++ OpenBSD/usr.sbin/ospfd/kroute.c 2013-05-31 22:37:59.434032287 +0200
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
-/* $OpenBSD: kroute.c,v
Hi misc,
i have wrote some C code to resolve my OSPF+BGP default route problem,
and now the problem is resolved by the following ospfd patch.
I have added the kroute-ignore-insert option to ospfd. This options
block kernel route insertion with a prefix, prefixlen and nexthop option
Example:
krout
Perfect Claudio, if you need some tests, tell me.
I will need this fix before middle june, then i can help you.
I cannot get /1 from MAN routers, sorry, then i'm blocked with one
router for now (and i hope the default route wouldn't be sent to the GRE
tunnel :p).
If you want i would help you to im
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 11:45:04PM +0200, Loïc BLOT wrote:
> My border routers obtain a default route in fact, and OSPF must
> redistribute this route to LAN Routers. Here is a scheme
>
>
> |-- R1 site 1 R3 Site 1
> | BGP AS 650XX | OSPF a3|
> |---
My border routers obtain a default route in fact, and OSPF must
redistribute this route to LAN Routers. Here is a scheme
|-- R1 site 1 R3 Site 1
| BGP AS 650XX | OSPF a3|
|-- R2 site 1 R4 Site 1
|
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 10:00:55PM +0200, Loïc BLOT wrote:
> In fact, this isn't really an interarea problem but a inter protocol
> problem.
>
> Next month i'll have two border routers which are connecter to MAN by
> BGP. In my LAN and on my tunnels i'm in a "LAN backbone" area.
>
> Because of th
In fact, this isn't really an interarea problem but a inter protocol
problem.
Next month i'll have two border routers which are connecter to MAN by
BGP. In my LAN and on my tunnels i'm in a "LAN backbone" area.
Because of the priority of OSPF and the default route redistribution,
the default rout
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 08:56:32PM +0300, Dan Shechter wrote:
> You can't filter OSPF routes inside an area. It will break the OSPF
> shortest path tree.
>
> I don't know about ospfd, but on Cisco IOS you can filter routes
> (LSAs) between areas and you can also prevent prefixes from being
> inser
You can't filter OSPF routes inside an area. It will break the OSPF
shortest path tree.
I don't know about ospfd, but on Cisco IOS you can filter routes
(LSAs) between areas and you can also prevent prefixes from being
inserted to the routing table of the router where the filtering
commands are en
OK for the tree, but refuse to insert routes in the kernel is useful.
It would be a great function to refuse inserting kernel routes from some
routers.
--
Best regards,
Loïc BLOT,
UNIX systems, security and network expert
http://www.unix-experience.fr
Le mercredi 01 mai 2013 Ã 20:56 +0300, Da
Hello all,
to begin, thanks to OpenBSD team & contributors for this very good
release.
I have a question about ospfd. Why ospfd doesn't have capabitilities to
filter some routes, or filter by sources ? (ok by source can be filtered
by PF, but if i want to refuse routes from specific hosts, or some
Hello all,
to begin, thanks to OpenBSD team & contributors for this very good
release.
I have a question about ospfd. Why ospfd doesn't have capabitilities to
filter some routes, or filter by sources ? (ok by source can be filtered
by PF, but if i want to refuse routes from specific hosts, or some
On 2013-02-11, Pawel wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I would like to ask, if it's possible to filter incoming and outgoing
> announcements from neighbors in the same area (in the same way as in bgpd)?
> If it isn't implemented, maybe somebody knows, if it will be possible in
> future releases ospfd?
> I'm
Hello all,
I would like to ask, if it's possible to filter incoming and outgoing
announcements from neighbors in the same area (in the same way as in bgpd)?
If it isn't implemented, maybe somebody knows, if it will be possible in
future releases ospfd?
I'm using ospfd from OpenBSD 5.1.
14 matches
Mail list logo
