Hi,
On 03/29/17 11:42, Janne Johansson wrote:
As a non-obsd dev but fan of running non-mainstream platforms, things like
this feels like a guarantee that those languages don't really hit off on
anything that isn't arm64 or amd64 (or i386):
and for that reason firefox will become less portable
You know things are bad when a programming language is named after a
type of often-unwanted corrosion (often associated with iron alloys) or
a type of devastating plant fungus.
And what good are these "memory-safe" languages when there are so many
that you won't be able to remember them?
On Tue,
2017-03-28 23:59 GMT+02:00 :
> Hello,
>
> I just want to know the opinion of OpenBSD developpers about Rust and Go,
> I already know Ted's opinion.
> http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/thoughts-on-replacement-languages
>
> As they are both touted as memory safe, what do you think about them ?
>
On 2017-03-28, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just want to know the opinion of OpenBSD developpers about Rust and Go,
> I already know Ted's opinion.
> http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/thoughts-on-replacement-languages
>
> As they are both touted as memory safe, what do you think about them ?
>
> Regar
On 28 March 2017 at 17:59, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just want to know the opinion of OpenBSD developpers about Rust and Go,
> I already know Ted's opinion.
> http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/thoughts-on-replacement-languages
>
> As they are both touted as memory safe, what do you think about them
Hello,
I just want to know the opinion of OpenBSD developpers about Rust and Go,
I already know Ted's opinion.
http://www.tedunangst.com/flak/post/thoughts-on-replacement-languages
As they are both touted as memory safe, what do you think about them ?
Regards
6 matches
Mail list logo
