On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Marcelo de Souza wrote:
> Or, what would be a good method for tests regarding this subject?
install openbsd. put machine on network. does it work?
--
And that's why Fischer would have beaten Kasparov.
> Btw. FreeBSD is doing bind so fast because they have random ephemeral
> ports disabled by default.
Translation for those who don't get that: They sacrifice security for
performance by default, making many tcp attacks easier. They then have
a knob to turn on better security.
-Bo
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 04:23:16PM -0500, Ober Heim wrote:
> http://www.linbsd.org/bench says it all to me :D
>
Please no, Fefes benchmark does not measure network performance.
The only network related benchmark in that suite is the bind test and this
one has nothing todo with network performance
za <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: OpenBSD vs FreeBSD (network performance)
Hi there,
Can anybody point me any technical documentation that compares
OpenBSD vs FreeBSD in terms of network performance?
Or, what would be a good method for tests regarding this subject?
An
On Thursday 28 July 2005 16:44, Marcelo de Souza wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Can anybody point me any technical documentation that compares
> OpenBSD vs FreeBSD in terms of network performance?
>
> Or, what would be a good method for tests regarding this subject?
> And what about the appropriate t
There is not likely to be an up-to-date set of *reliable* performance tests
that you can just look at on the web. The best thing you can do is make your
own based on the criteria that you are trying to compare them on, then
install FreeBSD and OpenBSD and see what works better for your specific
Hi there,
Can anybody point me any technical documentation that compares
OpenBSD vs FreeBSD in terms of network performance?
Or, what would be a good method for tests regarding this subject?
And what about the appropriate tools?
Thank you in advance.
--
Marcelo de Souza
7 matches
Mail list logo
