On 2009-03-31, John Brooks wrote:
> that was the entire point of my original post, they
> strip out their queue id from their acknowledgment
> for "security reasons", and then "accept all mail"
> including bogus recipients.
>
> I was curious if this practice is very widespread
> or not.
not very
Hi,
[ I don't yet see how this is related to Postfix, or OpenBSD ]
On Sat, 28.03.2009 at 11:47:41 +0200, Lars NoodC)n
wrote:
> I run into it a lot. My guess is that it's to distract from the "IT"
> team having selected software which doesn't work reliably. So if they
> make enough extra probl
hmm, on Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 02:35:15PM -0500, John Brooks said that
> that was the entire point of my original post, they
> strip out their queue id from their acknowledgment
> for "security reasons", and then "accept all mail"
> including bogus recipients.
>
> I was curious if this practice is v
that was the entire point of my original post, they
strip out their queue id from their acknowledgment
for "security reasons", and then "accept all mail"
including bogus recipients.
I was curious if this practice is very widespread
or not.
--
John Brooks
j...@day-light.com
...
> In our mail log
hmm, on Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 02:46:13PM -0500, John Brooks said that
> I've just received this response from a large corporate email
> system regarding their claim that emails sent to them are not
> getting through even though our logs contain acknowledgements
> of accepting the mail sent.
>
> I
(private) HKS wrote:
> Why sacrifice usability for no additional security?
I run into it a lot. My guess is that it's to distract from the "IT"
team having selected software which doesn't work reliably. So if they
make enough extra problems, no one will take the time to get to the real
cause: MS
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:50:21 -0500, Matthew Weigel wrote:
>Rod Whitworth wrote:
>
Anybody run into this kind of logic before?
>>> Yes, that's part of how greytrapping works:
>>> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=spamd#GREYTRAPPING
>>
>> No. That is NOT how greytrapping works. RTF
Rod Whitworth wrote:
>>> Anybody run into this kind of logic before?
>> Yes, that's part of how greytrapping works:
>> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=spamd#GREYTRAPPING
>
> No. That is NOT how greytrapping works. RTFM more carefully.
>
> spamd NEVER issues a 2xx code, because it N
On Mar 27, 2009, at 12:46 PM, John Brooks wrote:
Their response:
... "my understanding of the security policy
is not to acknowledge mistakes in email addresses as a best
practice defense against phishing and other types of email
delivered attacks."
Anybody run into this kind of logic before?
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:24:31 -0500, Matthew Weigel wrote:
>John Brooks wrote:
>> I've just received this response from a large corporate email
>> system regarding their claim that emails sent to them are not
>> getting through even though our logs contain acknowledgements
>> of accepting the mail
John Brooks wrote:
I've just received this response from a large corporate email
system regarding their claim that emails sent to them are not
getting through even though our logs contain acknowledgements
of accepting the mail sent.
In our mail logs:
... status=sent (250 Message accepted for
At 02:46 PM 3/27/2009 -0500, John Brooks wrote:
I've just received this response from a large corporate email
system regarding their claim that emails sent to them are not
getting through even though our logs contain acknowledgements
of accepting the mail sent.
Must be a legal firm? Can't think
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 3:46 PM, John Brooks wrote:
> I've just received this response from a large corporate email
> system regarding their claim that emails sent to them are not
> getting through even though our logs contain acknowledgements
> of accepting the mail sent.
>
> In our mail logs:
>
I've just received this response from a large corporate email
system regarding their claim that emails sent to them are not
getting through even though our logs contain acknowledgements
of accepting the mail sent.
In our mail logs:
... status=sent (250 Message accepted for delivery)
Their res
14 matches
Mail list logo
