On Nov 26, 2007 4:11 AM, mickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> poor dude pbly cannot do adding proper in his disklabel...
> MATH WORKS BITCHES!
The 'poor dude' is known for posting smart, mathy, and generally
insightful comics. Try browsing through his comics some.
As for me, the comic was perfect
Artur Grabowski wrote:
> Dual boot is for sissies who can't get a second machine.
Steve Shockley wrote:
| No, dual boot is for sissies who can't commit to a real OS.
Or for people who like dual-booting OpenBSD and OpenBSD, i.e. having
multiple bootable versions of OpenBSD on a machine.
When I in
"Amarendra Godbole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Never knew that "non-dualboot=>non-sissy" folks carry around multiple
> machines with them. ;-)
One possible theory is you need to be a non-sissy in order to be able
to lug them around
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implem
On 26 Nov 2007 17:14:50 +0100, Artur Grabowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > but can't call yerself a unix guru if havent fu*ed up
> > dual boot at least once :]
>
> never fucked up a dual boot. Only tried it two times and both times it
> worked. Dua
Artur Grabowski wrote:
Dual boot is for sissies who can't get a second machine.
No, dual boot is for sissies who can't commit to a real OS.
(Now how do I hide those mail headers...)
On Monday 26 November 2007, Nick Holland wrote:
> V. Karthik Kumar wrote:
> > Artur Grabowski wrote:
> >> frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>> but can't call yerself a unix guru if havent fu*ed up
> >>> dual boot at least once :]
> >>
> >> never fucked up a dual boot. Only tried it two
V. Karthik Kumar wrote:
> Artur Grabowski wrote:
>> frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> but can't call yerself a unix guru if havent fu*ed up
>>> dual boot at least once :]
>>
>> never fucked up a dual boot. Only tried it two times and both times it
>> worked. Dual boot is for sissie
frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hmm, on Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 05:14:50PM +0100, Artur Grabowski said that
> > worked. Dual boot is for sissies who can't get a second machine.
>
> single boot is for sissies who drag around 3 notebooks with themselves :p
I guess you've never hacked th
* Artur Grabowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-27 01:30:56]:
> Oh.. I've fucked up that many times.
>
> Always amusing. I once even had a kernel named:
> bsd.do_not_remove_this_art_really
> that Bob put there after the third time I had to borrow a dock from him to
> reinstall my laptop.
>
> //ar
* frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-26 19:13:02]:
> hmm, on Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 05:14:50PM +0100, Artur Grabowski said that
> > worked. Dual boot is for sissies who can't get a second machine.
>
> single boot is for sissies who drag around 3 notebooks with themselves :p
>
Yeah, but
Oh.. I've fucked up that many times.
Always amusing. I once even had a kernel named:
bsd.do_not_remove_this_art_really
that Bob put there after the third time I had to borrow a dock from him to
reinstall my laptop.
//art
David Gwynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> dual booting is having two kern
s to get a new boyfriend :)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/OpenBSD-in-the-webcomic-XKCD-tf4874348.html#a13962015
Sent from the openbsd user - misc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
hahahah, nice.
that being said as a complete newbie with just the help from the FAQ
and a calculator I never messed up a dual boot.
On Nov 26, 2007 3:14 PM, David Gwynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> dual booting is having two kernels. bsd and bsd.working.
>
> On 27/11/2007, at 2:14 AM, Artur Gr
* Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-26 11:14:29]:
> On 11/26/07, mickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 01:55:16PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:57:28AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > > > On 26/11/2007, Richard Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
dual booting is having two kernels. bsd and bsd.working.
On 27/11/2007, at 2:14 AM, Artur Grabowski wrote:
frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
but can't call yerself a unix guru if havent fu*ed up
dual boot at least once :]
never fucked up a dual boot. Only tried it two times and bo
Johan Mson Lindman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 26 November 2007 18:37:05 you wrote:
> > "V. Karthik Kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Artur Grabowski wrote:
> > > > frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > >> but can't call yerself a unix guru if havent fu*ed up
> > > >
Salut,
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 04:49:20PM +0100, David Vasek wrote:
> The Lynx displays only 'alt', not 'title', texts. Old Netscape Navigators
That behavior is actually correct since title= is for annotations to the
image while alt= is for the case when the image cannot at all be displayed.
(I'm
On Monday 26 November 2007 18:37:05 you wrote:
> "V. Karthik Kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Artur Grabowski wrote:
> > > frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >> but can't call yerself a unix guru if havent fu*ed up
> > >> dual boot at least once :]
> > >
> > > never fucked up a d
hmm, on Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 11:14:29AM -0500, Nick Guenther said that
> 'poor dude' probably never even tried... did you actually read the comic?
> meh. I find it more interesting that "BSD" appearently defaults to
> OpenBSD and not FreeBSD here.
it's for the massses. still more people know "bsd
hmm, on Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 05:14:50PM +0100, Artur Grabowski said that
> worked. Dual boot is for sissies who can't get a second machine.
single boot is for sissies who drag around 3 notebooks with themselves :p
-f
--
unicorns aren't myth, virgins are!
On Nov 26, 2007 5:20 AM, Richard Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.xkcd.com/349/
>
> Observe the ALT text on the comic.
>
> Haven't seen a PR on that one...
>
>
You have to mess up your dual boot pretty bad to end up with the shark
attack bug
--
Mark Mathias
"V. Karthik Kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Artur Grabowski wrote:
> > frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> but can't call yerself a unix guru if havent fu*ed up
> >> dual boot at least once :]
> >
> > never fucked up a dual boot. Only tried it two times and both times it
> >
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 05:14:50PM +0100, Artur Grabowski wrote:
> frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > but can't call yerself a unix guru if havent fu*ed up
> > dual boot at least once :]
>
> never fucked up a dual boot. Only tried it two times and both times it
> worked. Dual boot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Artur Grabowski wrote:
> frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> but can't call yerself a unix guru if havent fu*ed up
>> dual boot at least once :]
>
> never fucked up a dual boot. Only tried it two times and both times it
> worked. Dual boot
On 11/26/07, mickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 01:55:16PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:57:28AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > > On 26/11/2007, Richard Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > http://www.xkcd.com/349/
> > > >
> > > > Observe the
frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> but can't call yerself a unix guru if havent fu*ed up
> dual boot at least once :]
never fucked up a dual boot. Only tried it two times and both times it
worked. Dual boot is for sissies who can't get a second machine.
//art
frantisek holop a icrit :
> hmm, on Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 02:19:41PM +0100, Peter N. M. Hansteen said that
>
>> David Vasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
Is there OpenBSD actually mentioned anywhere?
>>> Hmm, I see. Not all browsers display properly. Source always
>>>
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
David Vasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Is there OpenBSD actually mentioned anywhere?
Hmm, I see. Not all browsers display properly. Source always
helps. It's a title, not an ALT, btw.
in the browsers I have within easy reach here (Konqueror
hmm, on Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 02:19:41PM +0100, Peter N. M. Hansteen said that
> David Vasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Is there OpenBSD actually mentioned anywhere?
> >
> > Hmm, I see. Not all browsers display properly. Source always
> > helps. It's a title, not an ALT, btw.
>
> in the br
David Vasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Is there OpenBSD actually mentioned anywhere?
>
> Hmm, I see. Not all browsers display properly. Source always
> helps. It's a title, not an ALT, btw.
in the browsers I have within easy reach here (Konqueror, Firefox and
that Microsoft thing) the text on
On Nov 26, 2007 1:15 PM, David Vasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Paul Irofti wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:57:28AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> >> On 26/11/2007, Richard Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> http://www.xkcd.com/349/
> >>>
> >>> Observe the ALT text
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, David Vasek wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Paul Irofti wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:57:28AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
On 26/11/2007, Richard Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.xkcd.com/349/
Observe the ALT text on the comic.
Haven't seen a PR on that one...
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Paul Irofti wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:57:28AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
On 26/11/2007, Richard Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.xkcd.com/349/
Observe the ALT text on the comic.
Haven't seen a PR on that one...
What do they mean by this?
Its a j
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 01:55:16PM +0200, Paul Irofti wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:57:28AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> > On 26/11/2007, Richard Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > http://www.xkcd.com/349/
> > >
> > > Observe the ALT text on the comic.
> > >
> > > Haven't seen a PR on tha
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:57:28AM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On 26/11/2007, Richard Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://www.xkcd.com/349/
> >
> > Observe the ALT text on the comic.
> >
> > Haven't seen a PR on that one...
> >
> >
>
> What do they mean by this?
>
Its a joke, I think e
On 26/11/2007, Richard Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.xkcd.com/349/
>
> Observe the ALT text on the comic.
>
> Haven't seen a PR on that one...
>
>
What do they mean by this?
--
Best Regards
Edd
---
http://students.dec.bournemout
36 matches
Mail list logo
