On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:34 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But it wouldn't hurt if you may take it as a little motivation to take a
> even closer look to the IP-Stack. You'll be suprised what you might find
> propably. *my personal oppinion so flame me privately* :)
>
ignoring the fact t
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 05:07:15PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:34:34PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I told you before you should use linux. OpenBSD sucks.
> >
> > Dude.. wanna bitching again?
>
> Sure.
>
> > You also just see the downsides of something, r
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 09:34:34PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I told you before you should use linux. OpenBSD sucks.
>
> Dude.. wanna bitching again?
Sure.
> You also just see the downsides of something, right?
Yes, your emails usually show the downside of your intelligence.
> It was
Yeah, comparatively, OpenBSD's performance isn't so hot in that
benchmark. But how many sites get even over 10,000 authoritative
queries per second?
Our network isn't huge (several million HTTP requests per day), but a
brief look at our logs shows we get on the order of 30 queries per
second acr
> I told you before you should use linux. OpenBSD sucks.
Dude.. wanna bitching again?
You also just see the downsides of something, right?
It was not supposed to show how "much" OpenBSD sucks!
OpenBSD outperforms still a OS wich is leading in the world.. MS Windows!
Even the IPv6-Part or the Netw
On 2/25/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The ISC made a benchmark of BIND on serval platforms.
> OpenBSD outperforms Windows but is the slowest (compared to Linux, fBSD,
> nBSD and Solaris!) of the other tested OSs. :-/
Yeah, comparatively, OpenBSD's performance isn't so hot in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ISC made a benchmark of BIND on serval platforms.
OpenBSD outperforms Windows but is the slowest (compared to Linux, fBSD,
nBSD and Solaris!) of the other tested OSs. :-/
This is completely unsurprising, considering that BIND takes advantage
of multiple processors
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The ISC made a benchmark of BIND on serval platforms.
> OpenBSD outperforms Windows but is the slowest (compared to Linux, fBSD,
> nBSD and Solaris!) of the other tested OSs. :-/
If I read the version numbers correctly, they for reasons of their own
stuck with a three
The ISC made a benchmark of BIND on serval platforms.
OpenBSD outperforms Windows but is the slowest (compared to Linux, fBSD,
nBSD and Solaris!) of the other tested OSs. :-/
Well take a look for yourself (hopefully some devs read this! Speacily
those who know how free() works!).
http://new.isc.o
9 matches
Mail list logo
