Jim Razmus wrote:
> * Steve Shockley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060322 21:35]:
> > I've currently got a server running syslog-ng (1.6.9) with
> > PostgreSQL (8.1.1) on a 3.9 snapshot from March 1. The setup has
> > been working well for a while, but I've recently been told to have
> > it accept syslog f
Steve Shockley wrote:
I've currently got a server running syslog-ng (1.6.9) with PostgreSQL
(8.1.1) on a 3.9 snapshot from March 1. The setup has been working
well for a while, but I've recently been told to have it accept syslog
for a couple of anti-spam appliance devices, and they generate
On Thursday 23 March 2006 10:26, Steve Shockley wrote:
> Any query which needs to iterate the whole database will
> take 10-15 minutes after a day or so, and that's no good for a web
> front-end.
The first order of business should be to get rid of these kind of queries.
---
Lars Hansson
* Steve Shockley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060322 21:35]:
> I've currently got a server running syslog-ng (1.6.9) with PostgreSQL
> (8.1.1) on a 3.9 snapshot from March 1. The setup has been working well
> for a while, but I've recently been told to have it accept syslog for a
> couple of anti-spam
On 3/22/06, Steve Shockley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've currently got a server running syslog-ng (1.6.9) with PostgreSQL
> (8.1.1) on a 3.9 snapshot from March 1. The setup has been working well
> for a while, but I've recently been told to have it accept syslog for a
> couple of anti-spam ap
I've currently got a server running syslog-ng (1.6.9) with PostgreSQL
(8.1.1) on a 3.9 snapshot from March 1. The setup has been working well
for a while, but I've recently been told to have it accept syslog for a
couple of anti-spam appliance devices, and they generate between 1-2
million sys
6 matches
Mail list logo
