On 2/10/09, Jesus Sanchez wrote:
> Josh Grosse escribis:
> O.o... another computer with screen near??
>
Yep! right in front of me ;-)
> belive me, print out some pages would affect the subsistence of
> trees, the paper factories use controlated environments with fast grown
> trees species to don
Josh Grosse escribis:
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:52:08 +0200, Neoklis Kyriazis wrote
Is there a way to have the installation notes handy apart from a
"dead tree" printout?
One can have the notes present in machine-readable form. Handy? No.
The ramdisk kernel operates in single-user
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:52:08 +0200, Neoklis Kyriazis wrote
> Is there a way to have the installation notes handy apart from a
> "dead tree" printout?
One can have the notes present in machine-readable form. Handy? No.
The ramdisk kernel operates in single-user mode, so there is no alternate
Hi,
I am new to *BSD and I am trying to instal openBSD 4.4 on an amd64
platform. I tried to find out how to have INSTALL.amd64 displayed
somewhere during installation (like opening a second console and using
less) but it seems that only one console is available during install.
Is there a way to h
misiu wrote:
Hello all,
I'm new to OpenBSD, I installed it a few times but than did not know
what to do realy. Right now I'm little more experienced with Linux and I
thought give it a nother try.
Now I'm runnin an Openbsd 3.9 Box.
Default setup. I try to run a Webmailbox and later Openvpn.
It
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 03:02:04PM -0700, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:21:54PM +0200, misiu wrote:
> > > Tony Abernethy schrieb:
> > >
> > > >The problem with a changed root is that everything you will ever
> > > >need to access
Or you could run mod_perl
Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:21:54PM +0200, misiu wrote:
> > Tony Abernethy schrieb:
> >
> > >The problem with a changed root is that everything you will ever
> > >need to access needs to be inside this changed root.
> > >All the
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:21:54PM +0200, misiu wrote:
> Tony Abernethy schrieb:
>
> >The problem with a changed root is that everything you will ever
> >need to access needs to be inside this changed root.
> >All the libriaries, etc etc --- that's right, another copy.
> >
> >One advantage of Ope
misiu wrote:
Tony Abernethy schrieb:
The problem with a changed root is that everything you will ever
need to access needs to be inside this changed root.
All the libriaries, etc etc --- that's right, another copy.
One advantage of OpenBSD is that they actually understand security.
(Most tha
Tony Abernethy schrieb:
The problem with a changed root is that everything you will ever
need to access needs to be inside this changed root.
All the libriaries, etc etc --- that's right, another copy.
One advantage of OpenBSD is that they actually understand security.
(Most that tries to pass
misiu wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I'm new to OpenBSD, I installed it a few times but than did not know
> what to do realy. Right now I'm little more experienced with Linux and I
> thought give it a nother try.
> Now I'm runnin an Openbsd 3.9 Box.
> Default setup. I try to run a Webmailbox and lat
misiu wrote:
Hello all,
I'm new to OpenBSD, I installed it a few times but than did not know
what to do realy. Right now I'm little more experienced with Linux and I
thought give it a nother try.
Now I'm runnin an Openbsd 3.9 Box.
Default setup. I try to run a Webmailbox and later Openvpn.
It
Hello all,
I'm new to OpenBSD, I installed it a few times but than did not know
what to do realy. Right now I'm little more experienced with Linux and I
thought give it a nother try.
Now I'm runnin an Openbsd 3.9 Box.
Default setup. I try to run a Webmailbox and later Openvpn.
It did not work
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 08:48:59AM -0500, Nick Bender wrote:
> Kind of off topic, but has any work been done towards implementing
> McKusick's snapshot and background fsck techniques in ffs?
I just won't say that the number of people working on it is inversely
proportional to the number of people
Hello!
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 08:48:59AM -0500, Nick Bender wrote:
>> > Wrt LFS .. is it production ready?
>> no, it's a disaster.
>Kind of off topic, but has any work been done towards implementing
>McKusick's snapshot and background fsck techniques in ffs?
Different project focuses it seems.
> > Wrt LFS .. is it production ready?
>
> no, it's a disaster.
>
Kind of off topic, but has any work been done towards implementing
McKusick's snapshot and background fsck techniques in ffs?
-N
Hello!
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 06:43:15PM -0500, Andrew Atrens wrote:
>> man mount
>> look for noatime
>Got it, thanks :)
>Interesting I hadn't considered it before, huh, I wonder why it isn't the
>default,
>historical reasons I suppose.
I guess, because you lose functionality over it.
Yes,
On 1/17/06, Andrew Atrens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
[a little paranoid, are we?]
> Wrt LFS .. is it production ready?
no, it's a disaster.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Hall wrote:
> Andrew Atrens wrote:
>
>> ...
>> And finally one last question that applies to both FFS and LFS - file
>> access/creation/modification metadata updates. Specifically I'm thinking
>> of atime's. Is there any way to switch off at
Andrew Atrens wrote:
...
And finally one last question that applies to both FFS and LFS - file
access/creation/modification metadata updates. Specifically I'm thinking
of atime's. Is there any way to switch off atime updates ? They don't
add much value for me, and I'm worried they might unduly ag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
I'm working on a embedded project and have been cycling through some
tradeoffs wrt using cf cards as disks.
I know these devices support wear-leveling, but I'm not sure how this
could work w
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 07:46:18AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ifconfig gre0 mtu 1376
> ifconfig: SIOCSIFMTU: Invalid argument
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ifconfig gre0 mtu 1400
> ifconfig: SIOCSIFMTU: Invalid argument
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ifconfig gre0 mtu 1450
> ifconfi
Hello,
it's my first time OpenBSD problem: I setup a network configuration with IPsec
and a GRE tunnel. There is an IPsec connection between a local loopback
interface (lo1) and a remote loopback interface (dummy0 on a Linux box). The
gre interface uses these loopbacks as tunnel src/dest. Followin
23 matches
Mail list logo
