On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 05:53:11PM +, Dimitry T wrote:
> P.S Is there any changes in performance if change in kernel conf i386 to
> i686?
Are you asking if you put into your kernel config file
machine i686
... that you'll see increased performance?
There's no such thing as "machine
2012/5/7 Dimitry T :
> P.S Is there any changes in performance if change in kernel conf i386 to
> i686?
> "Some reasons why you should not build a custom kernel:
>
> You do not need to, normally.
> You will not get a faster system."
>
> Can this applies to my question?
Why don't you spend 15 minu
Nick, thanks! Sorry for maybe stupid question. I am a beginner in openbsd
world.
> Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 13:44:49 -0400
> From: n...@holland-consulting.net
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: OpenBSD 5.1 i386- ports vs packages
>
> On 05/07/2012 01:29 PM, Dimitry T wrote:
>
misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: OpenBSD 5.1 i386- ports vs packages
> Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 17:29:36 +
>
> Thank you all for the detailed answers. Is there any changes in compiling
if
> recompile kernel with option machine i686, now uname shows i386?
>
> > Date: Mon, 7
On 05/07/2012 01:29 PM, Dimitry T wrote:
Thank you all for the detailed answers. Is there any changes in compiling if
recompile kernel with option machine i686, now uname shows i386?
Sure. Big change. You hurt yourself. Usually badly.
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#WhySrc
http://www.o
Thank you all for the detailed answers. Is there any changes in compiling if
recompile kernel with option machine i686, now uname shows i386?
> Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 14:03:40 +0100
> From: kevlar...@yahoo.co.uk
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Re: OpenBSD 5.1 i386- ports vs package
On Sun, 6 May 2012 04:03:46 +0200
ropers wrote:
> As for security, since the Openbsd.org packages and ports both come
> from the same source, there's no security advantage of ports over
> packages unless you don't trust OpenBSD.org and actually read all of
> the source code you compile (and, by th
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Dimitry T wrote:
> After a long reading I am still confused. On OpenBSD FAQ recommend to use
> packages, most users speak the same, but some speak that it is safer to
> compile programs from ports and then programs have better performance. Did
> I get the better pe
I think the remaining difference that's an advantage of ports is that you
can configure them differently. At the outermost level you can set a
flavor to enable/disable some feature, at a lower level you can modify the
makefile, still lower you can get in there and edit the source.
Back when y
On 6 May 2012 01:15, Dimitry T wrote:
> After a long reading I am still confused. On OpenBSD FAQ recommend to use
packages, most users speak the same, but some speak that it is safer to
compile programs from ports and then programs have better performance. Did I
get the better performance of the p
On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 11:15:13PM +, Dimitry T wrote:
> After a long reading I am still confused. On OpenBSD FAQ recommend to
> use packages, most users speak the same, but some speak that it is
> safer to compile programs from ports and then programs have better
> performance.
It is not more
After a long reading I am still confused. On OpenBSD FAQ recommend to use
packages, most users speak the same, but some speak that it is safer to compile
programs from ports and then programs have better performance. Did I get the
better performance of the program on my hardware if i compile tha
12 matches
Mail list logo
