Chris Smith wrote:
> uses less than 25w at idle and less than 30w doing a-j3 userland build
Nice to know it. :)
I have an Compaq Proliant with two 900Mhz processors. It needs about
105w when idle. Inspite of active PFC power supply. With luck I find
a Museum that wants it.
Rod.
* Nomen Nescio [2011-12-14 03:33]:
> > I've built up several of the Supermicro SYS-5015A-EHF boxes (1U rack,
> > dual core 1.66G Atom, dual Gb Intel LAN, IPMI) with 4GB and an SSD,
> > uses less than 25w at idle and less than 30w doing a-j3 userland build
> > (according to my cheap little wattage
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:29:32PM +0100, Nomen Nescio wrote:
| > I've built up several of the Supermicro SYS-5015A-EHF boxes (1U rack,
| > dual core 1.66G Atom, dual Gb Intel LAN, IPMI) with 4GB and an SSD,
| > uses less than 25w at idle and less than 30w doing a-j3 userland build
| > (according t
> I've built up several of the Supermicro SYS-5015A-EHF boxes (1U rack,
> dual core 1.66G Atom, dual Gb Intel LAN, IPMI) with 4GB and an SSD,
> uses less than 25w at idle and less than 30w doing a-j3 userland build
> (according to my cheap little wattage testing device).
At first I said "sweet!" b
On 12/13/11 10:47 AM, Chris Smith wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:32 AM, wrote:
It is no discovery, I continously change the computer. Right now searching
for an old one that do not consume much electricity. The best is a Siemens
with a celeron, 800mhz, the whole machine consumes 32w when idle
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 7:32 AM, wrote:
> It is no discovery, I continously change the computer. Right now searching
> for an old one that do not consume much electricity. The best is a Siemens
> with a celeron, 800mhz, the whole machine consumes 32w when idle, but goes
> to 42w or more when I do
* Peter Kay [2011-12-13 01:20]:
> On 12 December 2011 21:29, Henning Brauer wrote:
>
> > * sc...@web.de [2011-12-12 16:06]:
> >
> > > BTW: the ethernet on the motherboard (Asus K8U-X) does not work.
> > > "Acer Labs M5263 LAN" rev 0x40 at pci0 dev 13 function 0 not configured
> >
> > indeed. ne
First of all, thank you very much to all that answered my question.
To Nick Holland:
> Sounds like you've rediscovered this section:
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq12.html#amd64
It is no discovery, I continously change the computer. Right now searching
for an old one that do not consume much e
On 12 December 2011 21:29, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * sc...@web.de [2011-12-12 16:06]:
>
> > BTW: the ethernet on the motherboard (Asus K8U-X) does not work.
> > "Acer Labs M5263 LAN" rev 0x40 at pci0 dev 13 function 0 not configured
>
> indeed. never heard of it, might be as simple as a missing
* sc...@web.de [2011-12-12 16:06]:
> Peter Kay wrote:
>
> > Wikipedia says 'AMD64 supported by: all models with an OPN ending in
> > BX and CV' and 'E6 stepping or later'
>
> It seems I have a BO: SSE3, but not AMD64 according to dmesg.
>
> Henning Brauer wrote:
>
> > this one is a no-braine
On 12/12/11 12:38, sc...@web.de wrote:
> Nick Holland wrote:
>
>> No idea what you are saying there. It works, it will almost certainly
>> keep working.
>
> What does mean:
>
> cpu0: [...] LONG, 3DNOW, ...?
>
> Is this "LONG" perhaps the expected AMD64?
No idea, I'm not a kernel hacker.
If y
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Michael H Lambert wrote:
On 12 Dec 2011, at 12:50, Tekk wrote:
No, amd64 will only run on 64 bit x86 processors, so any 64 bit intel or amd
will work(amd made the architecture, so it's called amd64 or x86_64.)
No 32 bit processor will be able to run it
For completeness,
On 12 Dec 2011, at 12:50, Tekk wrote:
> No, amd64 will only run on 64 bit x86 processors, so any 64 bit intel or amd
will work(amd made the architecture, so it's called amd64 or x86_64.) No 32
bit processor will be able to run it
For completeness, non-Itanium 64-bit Intel processors.
Michael
No, amd64 will only run on 64 bit x86 processors, so any 64 bit intel or
amd will work(amd made the architecture, so it's called amd64 or x86_64.)
No 32 bit processor will be able to run it
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, sc...@web.de wrote:
Hallo!
I took the subjectline from "INSTALL.amd64".
I hope t
Nick Holland wrote:
> No idea what you are saying there. It works, it will almost certainly
> keep working.
What does mean:
cpu0: [...] LONG, 3DNOW, ...?
Is this "LONG" perhaps the expected AMD64?
BTW: Perhaps I end using i386, this has the advantage that I can
put the hard drive on any anot
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:02 PM, wrote:
> Peter Kay wrote:
>
>> Wikipedia says 'AMD64 supported by: all models with an OPN ending in
>> BX and CV' and 'E6 stepping or later'
>
> It seems I have a BO: SSE3, but not AMD64 according to dmesg.
>
> Henning Brauer wrote:
>
>> this one is a no-brainer
On 12/12/11 11:02, sc...@web.de wrote:
> Peter Kay wrote:
>
>> Wikipedia says 'AMD64 supported by: all models with an OPN ending in
>> BX and CV' and 'E6 stepping or later'
>
> It seems I have a BO: SSE3, but not AMD64 according to dmesg.
>
> Henning Brauer wrote:
>
>> this one is a no-braine
Peter Kay wrote:
> Wikipedia says 'AMD64 supported by: all models with an OPN ending in
> BX and CV' and 'E6 stepping or later'
It seems I have a BO: SSE3, but not AMD64 according to dmesg.
Henning Brauer wrote:
> this one is a no-brainer. [...] boot amd64 bsd.rd.
> either it boots or it doe
Google is informative. It depends on your stepping. Try it and find out.
Wikipedia says 'AMD64 supported by: all models with an OPN ending in
BX and CV' and 'E6 stepping or later'
If you don't have an OS installed, a boot disk with a CPU information
tool would help.
On 12/12/2011, sc...@web.de
* sc...@web.de [2011-12-12 12:37]:
> I have a Sempron 3000+ with 754 sockel, but I am not sure if it
> supports amd64 instructions.
while there are certainly people who dedicate brain capacity to
remembering which marketing name for a cpu maps to what core and maybe
what features it has disabled,
Hallo!
I took the subjectline from "INSTALL.amd64".
I hope this is also the right ISO for other AMD processors, not amd64.
I have a Sempron 3000+ with 754 sockel, but I am not sure if it
supports amd64 instructions.
Rod.
21 matches
Mail list logo
