> > > that indeed smells like a bug somewhere.
>
> Obviously : my bgpd/rde is now eating 21 more MB than a few ours ago (267
> MB total).
This morning's statistics : bgpd/rde is eating 481 MB (after a bgpctl reload).
# bgpctl sh rib memory
RDE memory statistics
177310 IPv4 network entries us
> > that indeed smells like a bug somewhere.
Obviously : my bgpd/rde is now eating 21 more MB than a few ours ago (267 MB
total).
# bgpctl show rib memory
RDE memory statistics
177462 IPv4 network entries using 10.8M of memory
682 IPv6 network entries using 48.0K of memory
355940
> that indeed smells like a bug somewhere.
How could I try to track this down ?
BR,
--
Sylvain COUTANT
ADVISEO
http://www.adviseo.fr/
http://www.open-sp.fr/
* Sylvain Coutant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-12 16:14]:
> > The increase you are seeing might just be
> > fragmentation.
>
> I did play a little with my config this afternoon. I ran two reloads and I'm
> currently eating near 250 MB. I'll continue to monitor in the next hours, but
> it begins
> The increase you are seeing might just be
> fragmentation.
I did play a little with my config this afternoon. I ran two reloads and I'm
currently eating near 250 MB. I'll continue to monitor in the next hours, but
it begins to be a little too much for just one full eBGP and one iBGP !
At some
* Sylvain Coutant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-12 14:48]:
> > Softreconfig in. If you modify the path attributes on "from" rules the
> > will be added twice to the table. You can turn softreconfig in off in
> > -current via the peer directive "softreconfig in no".
>
> OK. This is just a feature so
> Softreconfig in. If you modify the path attributes on "from" rules the
> will be added twice to the table. You can turn softreconfig in off in
> -current via the peer directive "softreconfig in no".
OK. This is just a feature so ;-)
Could I try to understand what softreconfig does and not as it
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 10:55:23AM +0100, Sylvain Coutant wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I upgraded to OpenBGPd-current (09/2/2006 snapshot) and didn't noticed
> yesterday about the memory usage. But, checking the rde process memory
> this morning gave surprising results :
>
> Box 1 : OpnBSD-current, 1 IPv4 fu
Hi,
I upgraded to OpenBGPd-current (09/2/2006 snapshot) and didn't noticed
yesterday about the memory usage. But, checking the rde process memory this
morning gave surprising results :
Box 1 : OpnBSD-current, 1 IPv4 full mesh eBGP, 1 IPv6 eBGP (681 routes), 1 iBGP
to Box 2, and 10-12 peers (2
9 matches
Mail list logo
