Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:39:15AM +0200, per engelbrecht wrote:
per engelbrecht wrote:
Stuart Henderson wrote:
How much RAM might I want in order to accept full views from 2-3 peers?
Thanks.
Running 3 peers, full table (170.097 prefixes) uses 317MB ram all included
On 9/29/05, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 240M RDE for 10 full views plus additional non full onesi (1.8Mio
> prefixes). I never got it to 300M with three full views.
>
Right now 240M for 10 full views is absolutely awesome. How much will
this change once soft-refresh inbound suppor
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 02:39:15AM +0200, per engelbrecht wrote:
> per engelbrecht wrote:
> >Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> >>How much RAM might I want in order to accept full views from 2-3 peers?
> >>Thanks.
> >
> >
> >Running 3 peers, full table (170.097 prefixes) uses 317MB ram all included.
>
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 10:26:38PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> How much RAM might I want in order to accept full views from 2-3 peers?
> Thanks.
>
Rule of thumb 30M per session plus 30M. This does not account for the
memory the kernel needs - just the three bgpd processes.
2 Peers should run
Stuart Henderson wrote:
How much RAM might I want in order to accept full views from 2-3 peers?
Thanks.
Running 3 peers, full table (170.097 prefixes) uses 317MB ram all included.
/per
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
per engelbrecht wrote:
Stuart Henderson wrote:
How much RAM might I want in order to accept full views from 2-3 peers?
Thanks.
Running 3 peers, full table (170.097 prefixes) uses 317MB ram all included.
Just to avoid any misinterpretation, that is for the BGP part only.
(".. ram all includ
How much RAM might I want in order to accept full views from 2-3 peers?
Thanks.
7 matches
Mail list logo