Apologies for the interruption, however, the claim of violation of of Copyright
infringement is... I'll use the word... dubious.
https://blog.delphinusdns.org/c?article=1717456278
"I heard through a psychic tarot reader that someone sold delphinusdnsd and
possibly put their name on it. "
All
On Fri, 07 Jun 2024 12:08:45 +0100,
Florian Obser wrote:
>
> On 2024-06-07 12:04 +02, "Peter N. M. Hansteen" wrote:
> > I tend to summarize along the lines of "BSD licensed means you can do
> > whatever
> > you damned well please with the code except claim that you wrote it all
> > yourself"
>
On Fri, 07 Jun 2024 10:48:45 +0100,
Stuart Longland wrote:
>
> GPL means they have to share changes they make with the person
> "receiving" the binaries (which includes the end user, since they were
> shipped the binaries stored on the boot device in said appliance). As
> the copyright holder, yo
On 2024-06-07 12:04 +02, "Peter N. M. Hansteen" wrote:
> I tend to summarize along the lines of "BSD licensed means you can do whatever
> you damned well please with the code except claim that you wrote it all
> yourself"
And this is why I get very grumpy when things like copilot steal my
code.
On 2024-06-06, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> if the outcome may be that the Copyright does not protect my works
> and its license then there is no need to retain a license at the top of every
> source file at all.
Without a license the default position in many jurisdictions is "this is
cop
On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 07:48:45PM +1000, Stuart Longland wrote:
>
> BSD means they don't have to share the changes they made, or even the
> original code. The only thing they cannot legally do, is change the
> copyright on the code, which as some have pointed out, is a tough thing to
> prove. M
On 7/6/24 18:32, Jan Stary wrote:
To be clear: I can sell delphinusdnsd-1.8.0.tar.gz
to anyone stupid enough to buy it, right?
It even works for GPLv2 software. There's more "smart TV"s and set-top
boxes running Linux than you can point an IR remote at.
GPL means they have to share changes
On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 10:32:42AM +0200, Jan Stary wrote:
> > The company who bought the scam sell, really bought something worthless
> > because there is an open source version and possibly better than what they
> > have as time goes forward (in my perspective).
>
> That's what I don't understan
> The company who bought the scam sell, really bought something worthless
> because there is an open source version and possibly better than what they
> have as time goes forward (in my perspective).
That's what I don't understand. If someone sold your open source
DNS server, they mostly scammed t
On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 10:39:30PM +0700, hahahahacker2009 wrote:
> > It should interest OpenBSD in one form or another since i used the same
> > Copyright and License as them,
> >
>
> No, as many people already said.
>
Sure. I can see how it would not interest you if you are a lazy sysadmin
wi
On Thu, 2024-06-06 at 12:10 +0100, Kirill A.Korinsky wrote:
>
> This door has already been opened, and the most notable case I
> suppose is
> that Linux developers took some code from BSD and put GPL on it:
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=117572345902445&w=2
>
Just to clarify this point,
Vào Th 5, 6 thg 6, 2024 vào lúc 09:41 Peter J. Philipp
đã viết:
>
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 10:59:01PM +0100, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> > On Wed, 05 Jun 2024 06:08:23 +0100,
> > "Peter J. Philipp" wrote:
> > >
> > > I have been made aware of hearsay that someone took my open source code
> > >
On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 03:47:41PM +0200, Mizsei Zolt??n wrote:
> Have you thought about what if they paid not for the software but for the
> support?
This is fine, this is within the bounds of the license. I'm *only* interested
if someone messed with the license, and I think if we as open sourc
Have you thought about what if they paid not for the software but for the
support?
Peter J. Philipp írta 2024. jún.. 6, Cs-n 15:29 órakor:
> On 6/6/24 13:10, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
>> On Thu, 06 Jun 2024 03:33:53 +0100,
>> "Peter J. Philipp" wrote:
>>> This isn't about Patents, this is about
On 6/6/24 13:10, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
On Thu, 06 Jun 2024 03:33:53 +0100,
"Peter J. Philipp" wrote:
This isn't about Patents, this is about Copyright. And that's the sole
interest of mine, and Lawyers are there for a reason. It should interest
OpenBSD in one form or another since i use
On Thu, 06 Jun 2024 03:33:53 +0100,
"Peter J. Philipp" wrote:
>
> This isn't about Patents, this is about Copyright. And that's the sole
> interest of mine, and Lawyers are there for a reason. It should interest
> OpenBSD in one form or another since i used the same Copyright and License
> a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 13:33:39 +0200
"Peter J. Philipp" wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 08:04:49AM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2024-06-05, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> > > I have been made aware of hearsay that someone took my open source cod
On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 10:59:01PM +0100, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Jun 2024 06:08:23 +0100,
> "Peter J. Philipp" wrote:
> >
> > I have been made aware of hearsay that someone took my open source code
> > protected under the same license as OpenBSD and sold it for a lot of money.
> >
On Wed, 05 Jun 2024 06:08:23 +0100,
"Peter J. Philipp" wrote:
>
> I have been made aware of hearsay that someone took my open source code
> protected under the same license as OpenBSD and sold it for a lot of money.
> I have no proof of this personally but I ask you to help me find evidence of
>
On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 08:04:49AM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2024-06-05, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> > I have been made aware of hearsay that someone took my open source code
> > protected under the same license as OpenBSD and sold it for a lot of money.
>
> There is nothing in either the
Il 05/06/2024 07:08, Peter J. Philipp ha scritto:
Hi,
I have been made aware of hearsay that someone took my open source code
protected under the same license as OpenBSD and sold it for a lot of money.
[...]
Thanks for any information leading to the lawsuit. I believe I will also
get in c
On 2024-06-05, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> I have been made aware of hearsay that someone took my open source code
> protected under the same license as OpenBSD and sold it for a lot of money.
There is nothing in either the ISC license used in OpenBSD (or in the
GNU public license for that matter),
Hi,
I have been made aware of hearsay that someone took my open source code
protected under the same license as OpenBSD and sold it for a lot of money.
I have no proof of this personally but I ask you to help me find evidence of
this. There is not much I can do about this, except if the person or
23 matches
Mail list logo
