On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, stan wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 03:08:25PM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
>> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, stan wrote:
>>
>> >On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:24:44AM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
>> >> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, stan wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:03:27PM -0500, D
Q: what's more annoying than top posting?
A: full quoting bottom posters.
On Nov 19, 2009, at 12:57 PM, stan wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 03:08:25PM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, stan wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:24:44AM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
On Thu, 19 Nov
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 03:08:25PM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, stan wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:24:44AM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
> >> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, stan wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:03:27PM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, 18 N
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, stan wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:24:44AM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
>> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, stan wrote:
>>
>> >On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:03:27PM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, stan wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 05:00:02PM -0500, D
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:24:44AM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, stan wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:03:27PM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
> >> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, stan wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 05:00:02PM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, 18 N
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, stan wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:03:27PM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, stan wrote:
>>
>> >On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 05:00:02PM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, stan wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Can anyone xplain this behavior to me?
>> >
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:03:27PM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, stan wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 05:00:02PM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
> >> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, stan wrote:
> >>
> >> >Can anyone xplain this behavior to me?
> >>
> >> Without access to your nameservers
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Bryan Irvine wrote:
>> You apparently have a system with multiple names and a single IP
>> address. Both cvsup.mch.chs and cvsup.meadwestvaco.com are assigned
>> address 10.209.142.151, but the reverse-lookup entry can't return both
>> names.
>
>
>You made that up. Yes it can
> You apparently have a system with multiple names and a single IP
> address. Both cvsup.mch.chs and cvsup.meadwestvaco.com are assigned
> address 10.209.142.151, but the reverse-lookup entry can't return both
> names.
You made that up. Yes it can. If it's configured to do so.
I'm guessing tha
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, stan wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 05:00:02PM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, stan wrote:
>>
>> >Can anyone xplain this behavior to me?
>>
>> Without access to your nameservers it's not possible to be sure, but see
>> below -- this looks normal to me.
>>
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:21:41PM +0100, Robert wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:06:28 -0500
> stan wrote:
>
> > Can anyone xplain this behavior to me?
> >
> > Given the following resolv.conf file:
> >
> > r...@pm3fw:root# cat /etc/resolv.conf
> > lookup file bind
> > search mcn.chs kapstonepap
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:21:41PM +0100, Robert wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:06:28 -0500
> stan wrote:
>
> > Can anyone xplain this behavior to me?
> >
> > Given the following resolv.conf file:
> >
> > r...@pm3fw:root# cat /etc/resolv.conf
> > lookup file bind
> > search mcn.chs kapstonepap
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 05:00:02PM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, stan wrote:
>
> >Can anyone xplain this behavior to me?
>
> Without access to your nameservers it's not possible to be sure, but see
> below -- this looks normal to me.
>
> >Given the following resolv.conf file
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:06:28 -0500
stan wrote:
> Can anyone xplain this behavior to me?
>
> Given the following resolv.conf file:
>
> r...@pm3fw:root# cat /etc/resolv.conf
> lookup file bind
> search mcn.chs kapstonepaper.com pm3.charleston.meadwestvaco.com
> nameserver 127.0.0.1
> nameserver
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, stan wrote:
>Can anyone xplain this behavior to me?
Without access to your nameservers it's not possible to be sure, but see
below -- this looks normal to me.
>Given the following resolv.conf file:
>
>r...@pm3fw:root# cat /etc/resolv.conf
>lookup file bind
>search mcn.chs ka
Can anyone xplain this behavior to me?
Given the following resolv.conf file:
r...@pm3fw:root# cat /etc/resolv.conf
lookup file bind
search mcn.chs kapstonepaper.com pm3.charleston.meadwestvaco.com
nameserver 127.0.0.1
nameserver 10.209.128.20
nameserver 10.209.128.26
nameserver 10.209.142.158
A
16 matches
Mail list logo