They have a pull request open to rename it to “h3sh" -
https://github.com/francoismichel/ssh3/pull/87
Hopefully sanity prevails there. Cutting in the namespace line by stealing the
next version number with zero backwards compatibility isn’t a great move to
gain a user base. Doing so with a se
I don't usually (ever?) pipe up with my other hat(s) on the
@openbsd.org lists -- but --
With my @debian.org hat on, I'll note that we[1] (and I think Fedora
too?) took issue with the name "ssh3", since it is not using (or even,
frankly, related to) the OpenSSH protocol. It'll parse a few OpenSSH
Den mån 5 feb. 2024 kl 08:28 skrev Carlos Lopez :
> Hi all,
> https://blog.apnic.net/2024/02/02/towards-ssh3-how-http-3-improves-secure-shells/
>
> Uhmm ... ssh over http/3? What do you think about it?
The concept of using udp (like wireguard and mosh) to get mobility
between networks seems nice,
On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 07:26:27AM +, Carlos Lopez wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> https://blog.apnic.net/2024/02/02/towards-ssh3-how-http-3-improves-secure-shells/
>
> Uhmm ... ssh over http/3? What do you think about it?
>
> Best regards,
> C. L. Martinez
>
I'm not an ssh dev but it seems like it'd tech
I liked the ability to forward UDP packets as well, but that can be
implemented in SSH itself, instead of adding another unnecessary layer.
On 2/5/24 04:26, Carlos Lopez wrote:
Hi all,
https://blog.apnic.net/2024/02/02/towards-ssh3-how-http-3-improves-secure-shells/
Uhmm ... ssh over http/3?
Hi all,
https://blog.apnic.net/2024/02/02/towards-ssh3-how-http-3-improves-secure-shells/
Uhmm ... ssh over http/3? What do you think about it?
Best regards,
C. L. Martinez
6 matches
Mail list logo
