Deanna Phillips writes:
> ; Do something about it
> ; Use another OS
> ; Complain
>
> Which are you doing?
None of the above. I ignore flash. My comment was only to point out
that gnash is not the best example to show why Linux emulation isn't
needed. Oh, I ignore Linux emulation, too.
Marco S Hyman writes:
> Deanna Phillips writes:
> > But for Linux binary emulation? No way. If you want that, run
> > Linux. What kind of people run Linux binaries on OpenBSD,
> > anyway? Don't give me that "I need Flash", since I spent months
> > of my life working on Gnash for OpenBSD ju
Deanna Phillips writes:
> But for Linux binary emulation? No way. If you want that, run
> Linux. What kind of people run Linux binaries on OpenBSD,
> anyway? Don't give me that "I need Flash", since I spent months
> of my life working on Gnash for OpenBSD just so you wouldn't
> have to use
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 02:14:27PM +0100, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> Jacob Meuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > that would require kernel level ALSA emulation, just as we have kernel
> > level OSS emulation for linux binaries using OSS. I have absolutely
> > no interest in that whatsoever. y
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 05:45:21PM +0100, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> Deanna Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Should a worthy
> > alsa-only *open source* app appear, I'm sure that someone could
> > port it to Sun audio.
>
> What about libjingle for example? It's opensource and used by al
Deanna Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should a worthy
> alsa-only *open source* app appear, I'm sure that someone could
> port it to Sun audio.
What about libjingle for example? It's opensource and used by all
Jabber clients which support VoIP - and it only supports ALSA (at least
the last
On Jan 9, 2008 4:10 PM, Deanna Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jonathan Schleifer writes:
>
> > Jacob Meuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> that would require kernel level ALSA emulation, just as we
> >> have kernel level OSS emulation for linux binaries using OSS.
> >> I have absolutel
Jonathan Schleifer writes:
> Jacob Meuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> that would require kernel level ALSA emulation, just as we
>> have kernel level OSS emulation for linux binaries using OSS.
>> I have absolutely no interest in that whatsoever. you'd have
>> better luck convincing Adobe to
Jacob Meuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> that would require kernel level ALSA emulation, just as we have kernel
> level OSS emulation for linux binaries using OSS. I have absolutely
> no interest in that whatsoever. you'd have better luck convincing
> Adobe to make an OpenBSD native version of
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 03:21:01AM +, Matthew Szudzik wrote:
> > There is also the question of ALSA compatibility layer which is in my
> > understanding slowly incorporated into OSS. Is it really important to have
> > ALSA compatibility layer? Can somebody give me an example of the software
> >
On Jan 9, 2008 12:45 AM, Jacob Meuser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 05:54:58PM -0300, Andr?s wrote:
> > Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > "the current audio system actually supports a wider variety of audio
devices."
> >
> > Sorry for the non-technically-based question but, couldn't
> There is also the question of ALSA compatibility layer which is in my
> understanding slowly incorporated into OSS. Is it really important to have
> ALSA compatibility layer? Can somebody give me an example of the software
> which requires ALSA (please exclude Skype although there is OSS version
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 05:14:18PM -0700, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> Andr?s wrote:
> >Jacob Meuser wrote:
> >"the current audio system actually supports a wider variety of audio
> >devices."
> >
> >Sorry for the non-technically-based question but, couldn't OpenBSD
> >contribute its development to
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 05:54:58PM -0300, Andr?s wrote:
> Jacob Meuser wrote:
> "the current audio system actually supports a wider variety of audio devices."
>
> Sorry for the non-technically-based question but, couldn't OpenBSD
> contribute its development to audio drivers to OSS so all operatin
Andris wrote:
Jacob Meuser wrote:
"the current audio system actually supports a wider variety of audio devices."
Sorry for the non-technically-based question but, couldn't OpenBSD
contribute its development to audio drivers to OSS so all operating
systems using it could benefit? And then OpenBSD
Jacob Meuser wrote:
"the current audio system actually supports a wider variety of audio devices."
Sorry for the non-technically-based question but, couldn't OpenBSD
contribute its development to audio drivers to OSS so all operating
systems using it could benefit? And then OpenBSD could support j
Awesome, It's great that they decided to release the code under a 2 clause BSD
licence... :-)
But I don't the the OpenBSD project should rip out it's entire current
framework and start using this package..
Still, It could serve as an excellent research... for additional drivers,
inspiratio
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 05:47:11PM -0800, Bryan Linton wrote:
> I just saw that OSS v4.0 has been released under a 2-clause BSD license. [1]
>
> I haven't seen it mentioned on the list yet and I know there's been a lot
> of audio related development going on in -current so I just thought I'd
> me
I just saw that OSS v4.0 has been released under a 2-clause BSD license. [1]
I haven't seen it mentioned on the list yet and I know there's been a lot
of audio related development going on in -current so I just thought I'd
mention it for anyone who might be interested. Their website hasn't been
19 matches
Mail list logo
