Hello,
The fix recommended by Remi works great. Can we have this into an official
patch?
Why I am not using it as Claudio recommends is that vlan20 in my case also
is a transit vlan like vlan21 so it cannot be a passive interface. From the
docs I understand that having carp listed as an interface
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 02:04:27PM +0100, open...@kene.nu wrote:
> Hello,
> I am seeing what I deem to be unexpected behavior with ospfd and depending
> on carp interfaces.
> Running 6.8 with latest patches applied on all three routers.
>
> # uname -a
> OpenBSD extfw1.lab.kambi.com 6.8 GENERIC.MP#
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 02:04:27PM +0100, open...@kene.nu wrote:
> Hello,
> I am seeing what I deem to be unexpected behavior with ospfd and depending
> on carp interfaces.
> Running 6.8 with latest patches applied on all three routers.
>
> # uname -a
> OpenBSD extfw1.lab.kambi.com 6.8 GENERIC.MP#
Hello,
I am seeing what I deem to be unexpected behavior with ospfd and depending
on carp interfaces.
Running 6.8 with latest patches applied on all three routers.
# uname -a
OpenBSD extfw1.lab.kambi.com 6.8 GENERIC.MP#2 amd64
My setup is as following;
Two openbsd boxes (FW1 and FW2) acting as a
4 matches
Mail list logo
