> >> Where are the choices for non-x86?
> >
> > The only remaining alternative is Sparc. Everything else is either old
> > (macppc) or expensive & unsupported (IA64).
I agree that sparc64 is currently the best alternative to the x86
architecture in i386 and amd64.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 06:53:38PM +0200, Lars Nood??n wrote:
> Martin SchrC6der wrote:
> > 2007/10/26, Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> Where are the choices for non-x86?
> >
> > The only remaining alternative is Sparc. Everything else is either old
>
Martin SchrC6der wrote:
> 2007/10/26, Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Where are the choices for non-x86?
>
> The only remaining alternative is Sparc. Everything else is either old
> (macppc) or expensive & unsupported (IA64).
It's too bad that Apple d
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 09:59:43AM -0400, Jeff Quast wrote:
> On 10/26/07, Matthew Szudzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Where are the choices for non-x86?
> > >
> > > The only remaining alternative is Sparc. Everything else is either old
> >
On 10/26/07, Matthew Szudzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Where are the choices for non-x86?
> >
> > The only remaining alternative is Sparc. Everything else is either old
> > (macppc) or expensive & unsupported (IA64).
>
> If anyone is looking for
> > Where are the choices for non-x86?
>
> The only remaining alternative is Sparc. Everything else is either old
> (macppc) or expensive & unsupported (IA64).
If anyone is looking for a non-x86 laptop, there aren't many choices. Is
there any information about OpenBS
2007/10/26, Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Where are the choices for non-x86?
The only remaining alternative is Sparc. Everything else is either old
(macppc) or expensive & unsupported (IA64).
Best
Martin
CALEA.
So, are backdoors like AMT required for all motherboards now?
If so, what are the details?
If not, what non-x86 options are available for regular workstations and
servers. There's a shitload available for embedded devices and such.
Where are the choices for non-x86?
-Lars
On 10/26/07, Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the specific context of CALEA, the AMT wikipedia page as of Fri Oct
> 26 07:45:59 GMT 2007, does not contain any references to CALEA, but do
> contain the links I provided above. The CALEA page points to links
> easily found with search engi
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 01:39:56PM +0200, Martin Schr?der wrote:
> 2007/10/26, Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I'm not sure there is a context in which Wikipedia is ever relevant: it
>
> It's only as relevant as YOU help make it.
>
> Shut up and improve it.
why don't you shuddup?
cu
--
2007/10/26, Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm not sure there is a context in which Wikipedia is ever relevant: it
It's only as relevant as YOU help make it.
Shut up and improve it.
Best
Martin
ropers wrote:
> On 24/10/2007, Lars NoodC)n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Seriously, what (affordable) non-x86 hardware options are available,
>> especially those without AMT or AMT-like backdoors?
>>
>> http://softwarecommunity.intel.com/arti
On 24/10/2007, Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Seriously, what (affordable) non-x86 hardware options are available,
> especially those without AMT or AMT-like backdoors?
>
> http://softwarecommunity.intel.com/articles/eng/1148.htm
> http://www.int
ur operating
> system on the other side of this brand new pile of shit.
Seriously, what (affordable) non-x86 hardware options are available,
especially those without AMT or AMT-like backdoors?
http://softwarecommunity.intel.com/articles/eng/1148.htm
http://www.intel.com/pressroom/a
01
>
> The setup seems almost perfect, except that the AMD Geode seems to be
> x86-based.
indeed. meaning it uses the same compiler and kernel as the most
widely tested port of openbsd.
> What corresponding non-x86 hardware options are common, recommended, or
> even available ?
why would you want such a thing?
Lars Noodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There has got to be non-x86 units out there, SBC or other, running Cell
> or Freescale or anything else.
If you look hard enough, I think you can find ARM/MIPS/PowerPC based
single-board computers vaguely comparable to the Soekris range.
Hec
boards mostly - BVM list some of the others but weren't capable of
answering email last time I tried).
> One ARM on the list, though. But isn't ARM now under Intel, maker of AMT?
Not all Intel CPUs are i386-compatible, of course...
> There has got to be non-x86 units out there, SBC or
Karl SjC6dahl - dunceor wrote:
> What is AMT?
http://www.intel.com/technology/platform-technology/intel-amt/index.htm
aka "rootkit for everybody"
http://strombergson.com/kryptoblog/?p=311
> Well ARM is not under Intel, Intel does ARM-processors just like
> several others do (Atmel, TI, Philli
t.
>
> > ... on epiacenter website ...
>
> I find only x86-based units there: celeron, amd geode, pentium, c3,
> eden, TM8600, etc.
>
> One ARM on the list, though. But isn't ARM now under Intel, maker of AMT?
>
> There has got to be non-x86 units out there, SBC or other, running Cell
> or Freescale or anything else.
>
> Regards,
> -Lars
One ARM on the list, though. But isn't ARM now under Intel, maker of AMT?
>
> There has got to be non-x86 units out there, SBC or other, running Cell
> or Freescale or anything else.
>
> Regards,
> -Lars
>
>
What is AMT?
Well ARM is not under Intel, Intel does ARM-p
es. I know. Hence my query to the list.
> ... on epiacenter website ...
I find only x86-based units there: celeron, amd geode, pentium, c3,
eden, TM8600, etc.
One ARM on the list, though. But isn't ARM now under Intel, maker of AMT?
There has got to be non-x86 units out there, SBC
0924004901
>
> The setup seems almost perfect, except that the AMD Geode seems to be
> x86-based.
>
> What corresponding non-x86 hardware options are common, recommended, or
> even available ?
>
> Regards,
> -Lars
>
>
Do you have any special reasons for not using x86-based hardware?
BR
dunceor
st perfect, except that the AMD Geode seems to be
> x86-based.
>
> What corresponding non-x86 hardware options are common, recommended, or
> even available ?
>
> Regards,
> -Lars
be
x86-based.
What corresponding non-x86 hardware options are common, recommended, or
even available ?
Regards,
-Lars
24 matches
Mail list logo
