Henning Brauer [hb-open...@ml.bsws.de] wrote:
> > Any idea why this was so much less of a problem with altq?
>
> it wasn't... the hfsc core was the same, and cbq worked exactly the same
> way too.
>
> People might not have paid as much attention? I dunno.
>
Raising HZ was frowned upon when I po
On 2014-08-22, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Stuart Henderson [2014-08-22 13:51]:
>> On 2014-08-22, Henning Brauer wrote:
>> > * Federico Giannici [2014-08-22 09:51]:
>> >> On 08/22/14 08:22, Henning Brauer wrote:
>> >> >* Adam Thompson [2014-08-21 19:13]:
>> >> >>Unless I've mis-understood all th
On 22-08-2014 08:58, Henning Brauer wrote:
> it wasn't... the hfsc core was the same, and cbq worked exactly the same
> way too.
>
> People might not have paid as much attention? I dunno.
I believe it also has something to do with the network cards getting
better and also the internet links speeds
* Stuart Henderson [2014-08-22 13:51]:
> On 2014-08-22, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > * Federico Giannici [2014-08-22 09:51]:
> >> On 08/22/14 08:22, Henning Brauer wrote:
> >> >* Adam Thompson [2014-08-21 19:13]:
> >> >>Unless I've mis-understood all the emails and reports about this, it
> >> >>a
On 2014-08-22, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Federico Giannici [2014-08-22 09:51]:
>> On 08/22/14 08:22, Henning Brauer wrote:
>> >* Adam Thompson [2014-08-21 19:13]:
>> >>Unless I've mis-understood all the emails and reports about this, it
>> >>affects low-bandwidth queues, not low-bandwidth inter
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Federico Giannici [2014-08-22 09:51]:
>> On 08/22/14 08:22, Henning Brauer wrote:
>> >* Adam Thompson [2014-08-21 19:13]:
>> >>Unless I've mis-understood all the emails and reports about this, it
>> >>affects low-bandwidth queues, not
* Federico Giannici [2014-08-22 09:51]:
> On 08/22/14 08:22, Henning Brauer wrote:
> >* Adam Thompson [2014-08-21 19:13]:
> >>Unless I've mis-understood all the emails and reports about this, it
> >>affects low-bandwidth queues, not low-bandwidth interfaces.
> >>In other words, limiting traffic
On 08/22/14 08:22, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Adam Thompson [2014-08-21 19:13]:
Unless I've mis-understood all the emails and reports about this, it affects
low-bandwidth queues, not low-bandwidth interfaces.
In other words, limiting traffic to 50Mbps on a 1Gb link will work fine,
limiting it to
* Adam Thompson [2014-08-21 19:13]:
> Unless I've mis-understood all the emails and reports about this, it affects
> low-bandwidth queues, not low-bandwidth interfaces.
> In other words, limiting traffic to 50Mbps on a 1Gb link will work fine,
> limiting it to 50kbps on the same link will not.
>
On 2014-08-21, Federico Giannici wrote:
> On 08/21/14 19:03, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2014-08-21, Federico Giannici wrote:
>>> We are using a firewall/qos server with a lot of HFSC queues.
>>> We have just switched to the new queueing system of 5.5.
>>> We'd like to get rid of custom kernels
On 08/21/14 19:03, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014-08-21, Federico Giannici wrote:
We are using a firewall/qos server with a lot of HFSC queues.
We have just switched to the new queueing system of 5.5.
We'd like to get rid of custom kernels because now there is no longer
the limit of 64 HFSC cl
Unless I've mis-understood all the emails and reports about this, it affects
low-bandwidth queues, not low-bandwidth interfaces.
In other words, limiting traffic to 50Mbps on a 1Gb link will work fine,
limiting it to 50kbps on the same link will not.
Yes/no?
-Adam
On August 21, 2014 12:03:12 P
On 2014-08-21, Federico Giannici wrote:
> We are using a firewall/qos server with a lot of HFSC queues.
> We have just switched to the new queueing system of 5.5.
> We'd like to get rid of custom kernels because now there is no longer
> the limit of 64 HFSC classes, but I have recently read that
We are using a firewall/qos server with a lot of HFSC queues.
We have just switched to the new queueing system of 5.5.
We'd like to get rid of custom kernels because now there is no longer
the limit of 64 HFSC classes, but I have recently read that there are
still limits to the efficacy of the q
14 matches
Mail list logo
