Re: New-bie pf rules question

2007-03-12 Thread Ramdas
On 3/10/07, Ramdas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/7/07, Ramdas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/7/07, Ramdas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/7/07, Pablo Halamaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 05/03/07, Ramdas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi Group, > > > > > > > > I have a server

Re: New-bie pf rules question

2007-03-09 Thread Ramdas
On 3/7/07, Ramdas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/7/07, Ramdas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/7/07, Pablo Halamaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 05/03/07, Ramdas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Group, > > > > > > I have a server with two lan cards both with valid ips . One interface > >

Re: New-bie pf rules question

2007-03-07 Thread Ramdas
On 3/7/07, Ramdas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/7/07, Pablo Halamaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 05/03/07, Ramdas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Group, > > > > I have a server with two lan cards both with valid ips . One interface > > (fxp1) is patched behind a CISCO PIX Firewall & Other

Re: New-bie pf rules question

2007-03-07 Thread Ramdas
On 3/7/07, Pablo Halamaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 05/03/07, Ramdas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Group, > > I have a server with two lan cards both with valid ips . One interface > (fxp1) is patched behind a CISCO PIX Firewall & Other outside firewall > (fxp0) > > I want that there should

New-bie pf rules question

2007-03-05 Thread Ramdas
Hi Group, I have a server with two lan cards both with valid ips . One interface (fxp1) is patched behind a CISCO PIX Firewall & Other outside firewall (fxp0) I want that there should be no greylisting/filtering on fxp1 (I have the related ports opened in the PIX) & it should be enabled only for