On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 11:28:31 +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>On 2006/01/19 10:39, Simon Slaytor wrote:
>> Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> >On 2006/01/19 09:38, Simon Slaytor wrote:
>> >
>> >>When comparing the two vpn solutions for speed, subjectively the OpenVPN
>> >>feels slightly faster
>> >
>> >If
On 1/18/06, Hans-Joerg Hoexer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 11:20:55AM +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> Forget about openvpn, there's no need to fiddle around with third
> party stuff.
OT: OpenVPN has its purposes, though this particular scenario
shouldn't be one of them. On
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 11:28:31AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2006/01/19 10:39, Simon Slaytor wrote:
> > Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > >On 2006/01/19 09:38, Simon Slaytor wrote:
> > >
> > >>When comparing the two vpn solutions for speed, subjectively the OpenVPN
> > >>feels slightly faster
On 2006/01/19 10:39, Simon Slaytor wrote:
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >On 2006/01/19 09:38, Simon Slaytor wrote:
> >
> >>When comparing the two vpn solutions for speed, subjectively the OpenVPN
> >>feels slightly faster
> >
> >If you're using compression on OpenVPN but not on IPSEC, that would
> >
Stuart Henderson wrote:
>On 2006/01/19 09:38, Simon Slaytor wrote:
>
>
>>When comparing the two vpn solutions for speed, subjectively the OpenVPN
>>feels slightly faster
>>
>>
>
>If you're using compression on OpenVPN but not on IPSEC, that would
>probably explain the speed difference.
>
>
On 2006/01/19 09:38, Simon Slaytor wrote:
> When comparing the two vpn solutions for speed, subjectively the OpenVPN
> feels slightly faster
If you're using compression on OpenVPN but not on IPSEC, that would
probably explain the speed difference.
Going to go against the flow here and say go for OpenVPN.
This recommendation is based on the following observations:
It's easy to implement
It's secure
It's stable
By using the tls-auth option the fact that your firewall is acting as a
vpn endpoint becomes invisible to the 'net'
It easily han
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 11:50:38AM +0100, Hans-Joerg Hoexer wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 11:20:55AM +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> >
> > Each will work; OpenVPN is slightly easier to set up, but IPsec will
> > likely offer better performance.
>
> Forget about openvpn, there's no need to fid
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 11:20:55AM +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
>
> Each will work; OpenVPN is slightly easier to set up, but IPsec will
> likely offer better performance.
Forget about openvpn, there's no need to fiddle around with third
party stuff.
Just make sure to take a look at vpn(8). I
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 04:14:34PM +1100, Zoong PHAM wrote:
> I need some advices about VPN.
>
> We have 2 offices, each is connected via ADSL to the Internet with a
> dynamic IP.
> One office uses OpenBSD as the firewall and the other uses the firewall
> functions of the ADSL modem.
> That can be
I need some advices about VPN.
We have 2 offices, each is connected via ADSL to the Internet with a
dynamic IP.
One office uses OpenBSD as the firewall and the other uses the firewall
functions of the ADSL modem.
That can be changed so that both offices use OpenBSD for firewalls.
We have full acce
11 matches
Mail list logo