Re: Nearly 1/4 of New Filesystem Gone

2007-02-02 Thread Nick Holland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... dangit... forgot to fix that. 8-/ yes, that was me... Nick.

Re: Nearly 1/4 of New Filesystem Gone

2007-02-02 Thread user
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Quoting Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> >> On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Tony Abernethy wrote: >> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> 16 partitions: >>> # sizeoffset fstype [fsize bsize cpg] >>>a: 390721968 0 4.2BSD 2048 16384 32

Re: Nearly 1/4 of New Filesystem Gone

2007-02-01 Thread Tony Abernethy
Greg Thomas wrote: > > On 2/1/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Quoting Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Tony Abernethy wrote: > > > > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> 16 partitions: > > >> # sizeoffset fstype [fsiz

Re: Nearly 1/4 of New Filesystem Gone

2007-02-01 Thread Greg Thomas
On 2/1/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Quoting Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Tony Abernethy wrote: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> 16 partitions: >> # sizeoffset fstype [fsize bsize cpg] >>a: 390721968 0 4

Re: Nearly 1/4 of New Filesystem Gone

2007-02-01 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Quoting Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Tony Abernethy wrote: > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > 16 partitions: > > > # sizeoffset fstype [fsize bsize cpg] > > >a: 390721968

Re: Nearly 1/4 of New Filesystem Gone

2007-02-01 Thread alex
Quoting Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Tony Abernethy wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 16 partitions: # sizeoffset fstype [fsize bsize cpg] a: 390721968 0 4.2BSD 2048 16384 328 # Cyl 0 -387620 c: 390721968

Re: Nearly 1/4 of New Filesystem Gone

2007-02-01 Thread alex
Quoting Bryan Irvine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Obviously something is screwy. Try posting the output of 'fdisk wd1', 'disklabel wd1' and at *least* the portion of your dmesg corresponding to the disk. No way to tell what's messed up just from df output. I know this may sound dumb, but can you als

Re: Nearly 1/4 of New Filesystem Gone

2007-02-01 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Tony Abernethy wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > 16 partitions: > # sizeoffset fstype [fsize bsize cpg] >a: 390721968 0 4.2BSD 2048 16384 328 # Cyl 0 > -387620 >c: 390721968 0 unused 0 0 # C

Re: Nearly 1/4 of New Filesystem Gone

2007-02-01 Thread RW
On 01 Feb 2007 12:26:09 +0100, Artur Grabowski wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >> I just moved a 200GB hard drive from a 3.7 box to a 4.0 box, and since >> my data was all backed up, I decided to run disklabel, create a fresh >> partition that spanned the whole disk, and then run newfs on that

Re: Nearly 1/4 of New Filesystem Gone

2007-02-01 Thread Daniel Bosk
I'll qoute Greg on this one: "He's asking about the 38G, not the difference between 200 and 183." /daniel >> I just moved a 200GB hard drive from a 3.7 box to a 4.0 box, and since >> my data was all backed up, I decided to run disklabel, create a fresh >> partition that spanned the whole disk, a

Re: Nearly 1/4 of New Filesystem Gone

2007-02-01 Thread Artur Grabowski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I just moved a 200GB hard drive from a 3.7 box to a 4.0 box, and since > my data was all backed up, I decided to run disklabel, create a fresh > partition that spanned the whole disk, and then run newfs on that > partition. I expect to not have all 200GB, between the wh

Re: Nearly 1/4 of New Filesystem Gone

2007-01-31 Thread Greg Thomas
On 1/31/07, Mats O Jansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I just moved a 200GB hard drive from a 3.7 box to a 4.0 box, and since > my data was all backed up, I decided to run disklabel, create a fresh > partition that spanned the whole disk, and then ru

Re: Nearly 1/4 of New Filesystem Gone

2007-01-31 Thread Mats O Jansson
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I just moved a 200GB hard drive from a 3.7 box to a 4.0 box, and since > my data was all backed up, I decided to run disklabel, create a fresh > partition that spanned the whole disk, and then run newfs on that > partition. I expect to not have all

Re: Nearly 1/4 of New Filesystem Gone

2007-01-31 Thread Tony Abernethy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 16 partitions: # sizeoffset fstype [fsize bsize cpg] a: 390721968 0 4.2BSD 2048 16384 328 # Cyl 0 -387620 c: 390721968 0 unused 0 0 # Cyl 0 -387620 Most likely, the disklabel or boot cod

Re: Nearly 1/4 of New Filesystem Gone

2007-01-31 Thread Bryan Irvine
Obviously something is screwy. Try posting the output of 'fdisk wd1', 'disklabel wd1' and at *least* the portion of your dmesg corresponding to the disk. No way to tell what's messed up just from df output. I know this may sound dumb, but can you also post the output of 'ls -al /mnt'? :-) --

Re: Nearly 1/4 of New Filesystem Gone

2007-01-31 Thread alex
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 09:42:07PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just moved a 200GB hard drive from a 3.7 box to a 4.0 box, and since my data was all backed up, I decided to run disklabel, create a fresh partition that spanned the whole disk, and then run newfs on that partition. I expect to

Re: Nearly 1/4 of New Filesystem Gone

2007-01-31 Thread Darrin Chandler
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 09:42:07PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I just moved a 200GB hard drive from a 3.7 box to a 4.0 box, and since > my data was all backed up, I decided to run disklabel, create a fresh > partition that spanned the whole disk, and then run newfs on that > partition. I e

Nearly 1/4 of New Filesystem Gone

2007-01-31 Thread alex
I just moved a 200GB hard drive from a 3.7 box to a 4.0 box, and since my data was all backed up, I decided to run disklabel, create a fresh partition that spanned the whole disk, and then run newfs on that partition. I expect to not have all 200GB, between the whole issue of poorly labeled dis