On 06/15/2009 06:58:33 AM, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:28:31PM -0500, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It occurs to me that multipath routing
> (http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#Multipath)
> might not play nicely with ftp-proxy on a firewall
> because passive ftp sessions cou
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:28:31PM -0500, Karl O. Pinc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It occurs to me that multipath routing
> (http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#Multipath)
> might not play nicely with ftp-proxy on a firewall
> because passive ftp sessions could multiplex the
> data and control connections vi
Hi,
It occurs to me that multipath routing
(http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#Multipath)
might not play nicely with ftp-proxy on a firewall
because passive ftp sessions could multiplex the
data and control connections via different ISPs.
My assumption here is that if you're using
multipath rou
3 matches
Mail list logo