On 11/26/05 11:58, Bruno S. Delbono wrote:
Is there a better, more secure replacement as a CMS?
If you are interested in a KISS approach take a look at TinyMCE, an easy to
configure JavaScript WYSIWYG(!!!) editor:
http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/example_full.php?example=true
(Instantly drop a
On 11/27/05, Bruno S. Delbono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there a secure php CMS that any of you might have had experience with
> (knowing full well that php and security are an oxymoron)
Did you try SPIP (http://www.spip.net) ? Several big french websites use it.
Fabien
On Nov 26, 2005, at 7:39 PM, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 04:56:41PM +0100, knitti said that
try avoiding anything in php. try avoiding anything in perl. yes,
with
that is a silly advice. if one knows what to look for, php and
perl are just as secure as anything else.
Gaby vanhegan wrote:
On 26 Nov 2005, at 11:18, Edd Barrett wrote:
Is there a better, more secure replacement as a CMS?
Tried postnuke or phpnuke or one of the other hundreds of varients
based around the word "nuke"?
Well, I have just look at ruby on rails and plone. They are both neat
pro
hmm, on Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 04:56:41PM +0100, knitti said that
> try avoiding anything in php. try avoiding anything in perl. yes, with
that is a silly advice. if one knows what to look for, php and
perl are just as secure as anything else. as with anything else,
there are security conscious ph
Bruno S. Delbono wrote:
Is there a better, more secure replacement as a CMS?
typo3
Stephan
On Sat, Nov 26, 2005 at 09:36:46AM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
> But this isn't really a perl problem, or a php problem. It's possible to
> write secure code in many environments, but it's not easy. Most cms
> developers worry more about having tons of features than about secure
> code. "Security
knitti wrote:
try avoiding anything in php. try avoiding anything in perl. yes, with
both languages it is _possible_ to write secure code, but actually
very seldom practiced. Everything else is a matter of taste and the
task to solve.
This is a shame about perl, but I can't say you're wrong.
this is a bit off-topic, but hey
On 11/26/05, Bruno S. Delbono <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a better, more secure replacement as a CMS?
use google, there are tons of cms out there, your question is
obviously too generic.
look at their vulnerabilities, look at their code, look at their
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 02:58:48 -0800, "Bruno S. Delbono"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>One of our servers got hacked this morning. The culprit turned out to be
>mambo. This is a second time this has happened with mambo and I am ready
>to junk it.
>
>Is there a better, more secure replacem
On 26 Nov 2005, at 11:18, Edd Barrett wrote:
>> Is there a better, more secure replacement as a CMS?
>
> Tried postnuke or phpnuke or one of the other hundreds of varients
> based around the word "nuke"?
I've heard that they're not great in terms of security either.
Have you considered Ruby on R
> Is there a better, more secure replacement as a CMS?
Tried postnuke or phpnuke or one of the other hundreds of varients
based around the word "nuke"?
I love the way these people have a website telling you all about them.
Regards
Edd
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 02:58:48 -0800
"Bruno S. Delbono" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> One of our servers got hacked this morning. The culprit turned out to be
> mambo. This is a second time this has happened with mambo and I am ready
> to junk it.
I would've junked it the first time thoug
Hi All,
One of our servers got hacked this morning. The culprit turned out to be
mambo. This is a second time this has happened with mambo and I am ready
to junk it.
Is there a better, more secure replacement as a CMS?
PS - Here is the 0-day expolit (for all versions of mambo not protected)
14 matches
Mail list logo
