> I’ll answer both of your replies here. But please note that Stuart provided
> the feedback I needed so from my point of view this issue is closed.
I'm happy you find the solution to your problem.
>
>> However, I passed a small amount of time with 5.6 and 7.3 from source
>> loading together.
I’ll answer both of your replies here. But please note that Stuart provided the
feedback I needed so from my point of view this issue is closed.
> Am 10.07.2023 um 14:30 schrieb Daniele B. :
>
> However, I passed a small amount of time with 5.6 and 7.3 from source loading
> together.
> In both
(moving to ports@, reply-to set)
On 2023-07-10, Mike Fischer wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I’m trying to figure out the best way to maintain multiple php-fpm setups at
> the same time and ran into a somewhat annoying issue.
>
> I’m not sure how many other users might have a similar situation? If this
> som
However, I passed a small amount of time with 5.6 and 7.3 from source loading
together.
In both cases I was using init.d scritps, that I can pass you.
Take it AS-IS, I do not want to recommend BSD subsystems or show off something
that is not part of my baggage. Indeed, for any system suggestion t
Problem arising in reading you is at its origins, in plain italian "a monte"..
;)
- PHP 8 is enough retrocompatible with any version you mention, and should take
in a
certain amount of benefits in performance gain and bug fixing;
- PHP-FPM should be enough configurable and versatile to support
Hi!
I’m trying to figure out the best way to maintain multiple php-fpm setups at
the same time and ran into a somewhat annoying issue.
I’m not sure how many other users might have a similar situation? If this
something too non-standard, let me know and I’ll shut up ;-)
Background
==
6 matches
Mail list logo
