Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> I run
>
> nice /usr/libexec/reorder_kernel &
>
> And my landisk is usable from the start.
I don't even tweak my landisk. These machines are 30% the
performance of the OP's complaint.
I don't see any reason to change the way it works.
On 2020-05-25 11:35, ULF wrote:
...
> My question is:
>
> considering that an opt out option has been already turned down, could at
> least old architectures be benefited of a "delay" option e.g. like tune2fs
> sets a fsck every n-th boot, could KARL, just for very old machines be
> tuned, say, to
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 05:35:17PM +0200, ULF wrote:
> Hello Devs,
>
> I followed, some time ago, the proposal of a user who suggested a diff for
> an "opt out" of KARL to be placed in /etc/rc.conf.local, proposal which
> which wasn't welcomed well.
>
> While agreeing that on servers and modern
Hello Devs,
I followed, some time ago, the proposal of a user who suggested a diff for
an "opt out" of KARL to be placed in /etc/rc.conf.local, proposal which
which wasn't welcomed well.
While agreeing that on servers and modern machines this is a great security
feature which implies quite a smal
4 matches
Mail list logo