On 20. juli 2013 at 5:34 PM, "Jan Stary" wrote:
>
>Why are you building the (huge) port,
>instead of simply installing the package?
Whoa. When did that get there? Thanks man!
O.D.
On 20. juli 2013 at 3:54 PM, "Amit Kulkarni" wrote:
>>
>> Nope, plenty of disk space left in /usr/local (my ports are in
>> /usr/local/ports).
>
>why are ports inside /usr/local. it should be /usr/ports. Some
>ports may fail.
Maybe, yeah. I updated PORTSDIR in /etc/mk.conf though. Anyway I just
On 19. juli 2013 at 9:13 PM, "Miod Vallat" wrote:
>
>> Pretty sure it takes more than 1.7G to build Java.
>
>But then how can java people pretend it has any usefulness, besides
>filing disks?
They say Android apps are just an excuse for Java devs to keep programming in
Java. Now that HTML5 can a
On 07/19/13 18:37, Martin Schröder wrote:
> 2013/7/19 :
>> % df -h
>> Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
>> /dev/wd0a 985M 50.8M885M 5%/
>> /dev/wd0k 9.2G434M8.3G 5%/home
>> /dev/wd0d 1.5G 12.0K1.5G 0%/tmp
>> /dev/wd0
> Pretty sure it takes more than 1.7G to build Java.
But then how can java people pretend it has any usefulness, besides
filing disks?
Miod
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 03:06:16PM -0600, Jack Woehr wrote:
> openda...@hushmail.com wrote:
> >On 19. juli 2013 at 3:17 PM, "Matthew Dempsky" wrote:
> >>plenty of disk space left in /usr/local (my ports are in /usr/local/ports).
> >>
> >>
> >>/dev/wd0h 3.7G1.8G1.7G52%/usr/loca
2013/7/19 :
> % df -h
> Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/wd0a 985M 50.8M885M 5%/
> /dev/wd0k 9.2G434M8.3G 5%/home
> /dev/wd0d 1.5G 12.0K1.5G 0%/tmp
> /dev/wd0f 1.8G404M1.3G24%/usr
> /dev/
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 08:37:40PM +, openda...@hushmail.com wrote:
> On 19. juli 2013 at 3:17 PM, "Matthew Dempsky" wrote:
> >
> >"write error"? Did you run out of disk space?
>
> Nope, plenty of disk space left in /usr/local (my ports are in
> /usr/local/ports).
>
> % df -h
Check also t
openda...@hushmail.com wrote:
On 19. juli 2013 at 3:17 PM, "Matthew Dempsky" wrote:
plenty of disk space left in /usr/local (my ports are in /usr/local/ports).
/dev/wd0h 3.7G1.8G1.7G52%/usr/local
Pretty sure it takes more than 1.7G to build Java.
--
Jack Woehr
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Jack Woehr wrote:
> Miod Vallat wrote:
>>>
>>> Pretty sure it takes more than 1.7G to build Java.
>>
>> But then how can java people pretend it has any usefulness, besides
>> filing disks?
>>
>> Miod
>
>
> métaphysico-théologo-cosmolo-nigologie :)
Hey, what editor
Miod Vallat wrote:
Pretty sure it takes more than 1.7G to build Java.
But then how can java people pretend it has any usefulness, besides
filing disks?
Miod
métaphysico-théologo-cosmolo-nigologie :)
Language wars are s-o-o-o 20th century.
--
Jack Woehr # "We commonly say we h
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 09:12:57PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > Pretty sure it takes more than 1.7G to build Java.
>
> But then how can java people pretend it has any usefulness, besides
> filing disks?
^^
Rightful cobol successor, then
See yesterday's dilbert...
http://dilbert.com/strip
On 19. juli 2013 at 3:17 PM, "Matthew Dempsky" wrote:
>
>"write error"? Did you run out of disk space?
Nope, plenty of disk space left in /usr/local (my ports are in
/usr/local/ports).
% df -h
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/wd0a 985M 50.8M885M 5%
Hi,
Anybody managed to build /usr/ports/devel/jdk on OpenBSD 5.3?
Getting a rather nasty compile error here on amd64, was wondering if maybe
someone could help? Tried asking on the ports mailinglist as well as reaching
out to the port maintainer but no luck.
http://pastie.org/8155843
O.D.
"write error"? Did you run out of disk space?
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 7:55 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anybody managed to build /usr/ports/devel/jdk on OpenBSD 5.3?
>
> Getting a rather nasty compile error here on amd64, was wondering if maybe
> someone could help? Tried asking on the ports mailingli
15 matches
Mail list logo
