Re: Issue with the keep state statment

2009-01-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009-01-20, TeXitoi wrote: > "Rioux, Christophe" writes: > >> => the 2 other rules will be no more used because of the keep state >> >> What is the alternativ to remake some like before the migration ? looks like you could probably use some reply-to on incoming connections, instead of route-

Re: Issue with the keep state statment

2009-01-20 Thread TeXitoi
"Rioux, Christophe" writes: > => the 2 other rules will be no more used because of the keep state > > What is the alternativ to remake some like before the migration ? no state, see pf.conf(5) -- Guillaume Pinot http://www.irccyn.ec-nantes.fr/~pinot/ ``Computers are good at

Issue with the keep state statment

2009-01-20 Thread Rioux, Christophe
Hi I read in the manual, that since the 4.1 version, the keep state rule is automatically set to keep state. Before migrating to 4.4, I had the 3.9 and with following configuration: Internet1 | OpenBsd (Internal)| --- Server Internet2 | O