Re: Invalid partition table (was /usr/obj partition AWOL)

2007-06-08 Thread Emilio Perea
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 10:41:40PM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > This is very odd on several fronts. First, someone has obviously > been writing on the MBR for no good reason. I just tested an fdisk > compiled to day and noticed no oddities on my i386. > > Second, the fact that you find a d

Re: Invalid partition table (was /usr/obj partition AWOL)

2007-06-08 Thread Jimmy Mitchener
On 6/8/07, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > c: 7168196763 unused 0 0 # Cyl 0*- 4461 > d: 210445263 4.2BSD 2048 16384 132 # Cyl 0*- 130 Ah -- your 'c' partition does not start at 0. It's an old FreeBSD partition on yo

Re: Invalid partition table (was /usr/obj partition AWOL)

2007-06-08 Thread Theo de Raadt
> c: 7168196763 unused 0 0 # Cyl 0*- > 4461 > d: 210445263 4.2BSD 2048 16384 132 # Cyl 0*- > 130 Ah -- your 'c' partition does not start at 0. It's an old FreeBSD partition on your disk. That should not work; it is bunk. W

Re: Invalid partition table (was /usr/obj partition AWOL)

2007-06-08 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
This is very odd on several fronts. First, someone has obviously been writing on the MBR for no good reason. I just tested an fdisk compiled to day and noticed no oddities on my i386. Second, the fact that you find a disklabel. Since we no longer store or look for disklabels in FreeBSD partitions

Invalid partition table (was /usr/obj partition AWOL)

2007-06-08 Thread Emilio Perea
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 04:58:18PM -0500, Emilio Perea wrote: > On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 07:50:24PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > I have thinking a bit more about the problem, and it is very likely the > > following scenario happened: > > > > 1. Kernel upgrade by source. > > > > 2. Reboot > > >