Hi,
On Sat, 30.09.2006 at 12:43:00 +0200, Maxim Bourmistrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Why don't ignore them and don't buy their products?
this is easier said than done.
> I have already a list of vendors I'm not buying products from anymore,
> like Adaptec.
I also have such a list which eg.
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 03:03:57AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
[snip]
> Majid Awad at Intel has stated to developers that he is the current
> person who is responsible for this particular area. So go ahead, let
> him know how you feel about this.
>
> Again, his email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 9/30/06, Maxim Bourmistrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why don't ignore them and don't buy their products?
don't buy their productss. but don't ignore them either.
let them know the reason why you don'y buy their products.
help them change and improve their business. :-)
Kind Regards
Siju
On 9/30/06, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We would also like Intel to GRANT us distribution rights for the
binary firmwares of their 3 wireless chipsets. Quite frankly we don't
care what their reasons are, because their reasons must be lies
according to the slides Intel presented at a
On 2006/09/30 20:19, Bill wrote:
> If Intel was more cooperative, would it help with getting the Intel
> Pro/1000MT Dual I have sitting on my desk working? I have the version
> that don't work.
I don't know about the duals, but I had a not-working quad that
was receptive to having irq assignments
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:57:10 +0200
Robert Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake:
> That's what I am doing too! I am trying to convince all of our customers to
> not
> use the products of Open Source unfreandly vendors. And guess what? They
> are going to buy the hardware we recommend them because we kn
Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Majid Awad at Intel has stated to developers that he is the current
> person who is responsible for this particular area. So go ahead, let
> him know how you feel about this.
>
> Again, his email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> So let's win back the rights to run the hardwa
Maxim Bourmistrov wrote:
Why don't ignore them and don't buy their products?
I have already a list of vendors I'm not buying products from anymore, like
Adaptec.
I'm also encouraging people to buy products from OpenSource-friendly vendors,
like RaLink.
Taking them to task and not buying their
That's what I am doing too! I am trying to convince all of our customers to not
use the products of Open Source unfreandly vendors. And guess what? They
are going to buy the hardware we recommend them because we know what is working
and what not. And most of our customers are running Open Source o
Why don't ignore them and don't buy their products?
I have already a list of vendors I'm not buying products from anymore, like
Adaptec.
I'm also encouraging people to buy products from OpenSource-friendly vendors,
like RaLink.
//Maxim
On Saturday 30 September 2006 12:28, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 03:03:57AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Regarding Intel wireless chips and distribution rights...
>
> > From: "Damien Bergamini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > [...]
> >
> > Intel's policy with respect to open-source software[1] which
> > has been presented at OSDL (I wasn't the
Regarding Intel wireless chips and distribution rights...
> From: "Damien Bergamini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [...]
>
> Intel's policy with respect to open-source software[1] which
> has been presented at OSDL (I wasn't there unfortunately) is
> clear and can be summarized as follow:
>
> - make us
Intel's policy with respect to open-source software[1] which
has been presented at OSDL (I wasn't there unfortunately) is
clear and can be summarized as follow:
- make us look like we're open-source friendly by opening
a project on sourceforge.
- give the open-source community the bare minimum s
13 matches
Mail list logo
