On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:49 PM, mxb wrote:
>
> On Apr 3, 2012, at 4:31 PM, Tony Sarendal wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 03:09:37PM +0200, Tony Sarendal wrote:
> >>> When testing new boxes with Intel E3-1270 cpu I don't see AES
On Apr 3, 2012, at 4:31 PM, Tony Sarendal wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 03:09:37PM +0200, Tony Sarendal wrote:
>>> When testing new boxes with Intel E3-1270 cpu I don't see AES on the
>> cpu's
>>> in dmesg.
>>> Does this mean that the a
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 03:09:37PM +0200, Tony Sarendal wrote:
> > When testing new boxes with Intel E3-1270 cpu I don't see AES on the
> cpu's
> > in dmesg.
> > Does this mean that the aes-ni stuff isn't used on these ? I was a bit
> > curio
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 03:09:37PM +0200, Tony Sarendal wrote:
> When testing new boxes with Intel E3-1270 cpu I don't see AES on the cpu's
> in dmesg.
> Does this mean that the aes-ni stuff isn't used on these ? I was a bit
> curious to see if it had any effect on ipsec performance.
According to
When testing new boxes with Intel E3-1270 cpu I don't see AES on the cpu's
in dmesg.
Does this mean that the aes-ni stuff isn't used on these ? I was a bit
curious to see if it had any effect on ipsec performance.
Regards Tony
test3.pio# dmesg
OpenBSD 5.1-current (GENERIC.MP) #258: Mon Apr 2 12:
5 matches
Mail list logo