Re: Intel Core 2 - round #2

2007-07-12 Thread bofh
On 12 Jul 2007 09:56:03 +0200, Artur Grabowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think that's what he said. He wasn't contradicting me, he was just amplifying my message. :) In that case, color me *blush* :) Apologies Jacob. -Tai -- "This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosi

Re: Intel Core 2 - round #2

2007-07-12 Thread Artur Grabowski
bofh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So, everyone picks up on the one thing that Linus fixed a while back, > the TLB stuff. What about the rest of the bugs? The non-TLB crap? > How is Art ignoring the relevance of the rest of the message? He just > said, the TLB is just a minor issue, that the *O

Re: Intel Core 2 - round #2

2007-07-11 Thread bofh
On 7/11/07, Jacob Yocom-Piatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Artur Grabowski wrote: > The TLB issues are just one small part of what Theo was talking about, > not even the most important one. > > Count the number of bugs in the errata. Only a very few of them deal with > the TLB and most of those are

Re: Intel Core 2 - round #2

2007-07-11 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 04:33:24PM -0700, John Mendenhall wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Jason McIntyre wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 06:21:43PM -0500, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote: > > > > > > the term "rathered" comes to mind. > > > > > > > what does it mean? > > "Dan Rather"-ed > so i sh

Re: Intel Core 2 - round #2

2007-07-11 Thread John Mendenhall
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Jason McIntyre wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 06:21:43PM -0500, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote: > > > > the term "rathered" comes to mind. > > > > what does it mean? "Dan Rather"-ed JohnM -- john mendenhall [EMAIL PROTECTED] surf utopia internet services

Re: Intel Core 2 - round #2

2007-07-11 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 06:21:43PM -0500, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote: > > the term "rathered" comes to mind. > what does it mean? jmc

Re: Intel Core 2 - round #2

2007-07-11 Thread Jacob Yocom-Piatt
Artur Grabowski wrote: Christoph Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Linus contradicts Theo on Intel TLB issue: http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=559 No he doesn't. The article is confused and missed the whole point. The TLB issues are just one small part of what Theo was talking about, not

Re: Intel Core 2 - round #2

2007-07-11 Thread bofh
On 11 Jul 2007 10:59:12 +0200, Artur Grabowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Christoph Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Linus contradicts Theo on Intel TLB issue: > http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=559 Count the number of bugs in the errata. Only a very few of them deal with the TLB and most of tho

Re: Intel Core 2 - round #2

2007-07-11 Thread Artur Grabowski
Christoph Egger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Linus contradicts Theo on Intel TLB issue: > http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=559 No he doesn't. The article is confused and missed the whole point. The TLB issues are just one small part of what Theo was talking about, not even the most important one.

Intel Core 2 - round #2

2007-07-10 Thread Christoph Egger
Linus contradicts Theo on Intel TLB issue: http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=559 Christoph