On 2020-08-12 21:30, Dan Peretz wrote:
Hello, the FAQ states this:
"The installXX.iso and installXX.fs images do not contain an
SHA256.sig file, so the installer will complain that it can't check
the signature of the included sets [...] This is because it would make
no sense for the installer
Dan Peretz wrote:
> Thank you for responding, Theo :)
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at (...):59 AM Theo de Raadt wrote:
> >
> > the FAQ is wrong.
> >
> > Those images don't contain signatures because my build & sign
> > procedure does not have a way to sign something, then continue
> > building, the
Thank you for responding, Theo :)
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at (...):59 AM Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> the FAQ is wrong.
>
> Those images don't contain signatures because my build & sign
> procedure does not have a way to sign something, then continue
> building, then sign the result.
>
>
> If you looked
Dan Peretz wrote:
> Hello, the FAQ states this:
> "The installXX.iso and installXX.fs images do not contain an
> SHA256.sig file, so the installer will complain that it can't check
> the signature of the included sets [...] This is because it would make
> no sense for the installer to verify them
Hello, the FAQ states this:
"The installXX.iso and installXX.fs images do not contain an
SHA256.sig file, so the installer will complain that it can't check
the signature of the included sets [...] This is because it would make
no sense for the installer to verify them. If someone were to make a
ro
5 matches
Mail list logo
