Resurrecting an old topic...
On 2011-10-27 16:05, Stefan Rinkes wrote:
I'm currently using a current kernel with following patch:
--- sys/netinet6/in6.c 8 Aug 2011 13:04:35 - 1.93
+++ sys/netinet6/in6.c 27 Oct 2011 19:59:00 -
@@ -2476,6 +2476,14 @@ in6if_do_dad(struct ifnet *ifp)
* NS wo
Hi,
Did you two even read what problem I described?
Am 27.10.2011 20:44, schrieb David Newman:
On 10/25/11 6:20 PM, Jussi Peltola wrote:
I had some similar looking problems some releases back. Using a separate
carp if for ipv6 mostly fixed it. Didn't write down the exact problem,
though.
How
On 10/25/11 6:20 PM, Jussi Peltola wrote:
> I had some similar looking problems some releases back. Using a separate
> carp if for ipv6 mostly fixed it. Didn't write down the exact problem,
> though.
>
Had a similar issue awhile back, with duplicate messages due to both pf
boxes thinking they wer
I had some similar looking problems some releases back. Using a separate
carp if for ipv6 mostly fixed it. Didn't write down the exact problem,
though.
Hi,
I'm still playing/testing around with CARP and ran into some
problems with IPv6 on CARP.
Here the configuration:
System1:
$ ifconfig carp
carp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
lladdr 00:00:5e:00:01:65
priority: 0
carp: carpdev em0 advbase 1 balancing ip-stealth
5 matches
Mail list logo