On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:48 PM, David Vasek wrote:
> Do you mean ssh sessions to a number of machines? And what measure would you
> have then against editing files in a wrong machine, killing a daemon, newfs
> a disk partition, etc?
Obviously, the answer is virtualization, so that there's only o
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Theodore Wynnychenko wrote:
Anyway, I would like to have the system confirm a shutdown or reboot
before actually doing it.
Why?
And who will be allowed to initiate a shutdown that way?
Without knowing that, it's hard to suggest a sane approach.
I was just thinking abo
> >> Anyway, I would like to have the system confirm a shutdown or reboot
> >> before actually doing it.
>
> >Why?
> >And who will be allowed to initiate a shutdown that way?
>
> >Without knowing that, it's hard to suggest a sane approach.
>
> I was just thinking about the possibility of having
On Wed, December 2, 2009 8:50 am, Theodore Wynnychenko wrote:
> I was just thinking about the possibility of having more than one SSH
> session open, and mistakenly shutting down the wrong one. I agree that
> this
> should be unlikely to occur, but I wanted to see if I could devise a
> simply
> se
(OPPS, I mean to send this to the list last night.)
Hello:
Thanks.
>> Anyway, I would like to have the system confirm a shutdown or reboot
>> before actually doing it.
>Why?
>And who will be allowed to initiate a shutdown that way?
>Without knowing that, it's hard to suggest a sane approach.
On Dec 01 22:41:38, Robert wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:53:40 -0600
> "Theodore Wynnychenko" wrote:
>
> > Hello:
> >
> > I have been unable to discover this answer for myself. If I missed
> > this somewhere, sorry for bothering the list.
> >
> > Anyway, I would like to have the system confir
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda <
acam...@the00z.org> wrote:
> Or don't give to your useless staff root access...
>
>
Indeed. Many problems can be solved with this simple concept.
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 10:53:40AM -0600, Theodore Wynnychenko wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I have been unable to discover this answer for myself. If I missed this
> somewhere, sorry for bothering the list.
>
> Anyway, I would like to have the system confirm a shutdown or reboot before
> actually doing i
On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:53:40 -0600
"Theodore Wynnychenko" wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I have been unable to discover this answer for myself. If I missed
> this somewhere, sorry for bothering the list.
>
> Anyway, I would like to have the system confirm a shutdown or reboot
> before actually doing it.
>
Hi Theodore,
> Anyway, I would like to have the system confirm a shutdown or reboot
> before actually doing it.
Why?
And who will be allowed to initiate a shutdown that way?
Without knowing that, it's hard to suggest a sane approach.
> I could do something like rename the shutdown/reboot/halt c
On Dec 01 10:53:40, Theodore Wynnychenko wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I have been unable to discover this answer for myself. If I missed this
> somewhere, sorry for bothering the list.
>
> Anyway, I would like to have the system confirm a shutdown or reboot before
> actually doing it.
Why? Somebody alre
Hello:
I have been unable to discover this answer for myself. If I missed this
somewhere, sorry for bothering the list.
Anyway, I would like to have the system confirm a shutdown or reboot before
actually doing it.
I could do something like rename the shutdown/reboot/halt commands, and then
wri
12 matches
Mail list logo
