Re: High ACPI CPU load

2023-07-17 Thread Brian Conway
On Sat, Jul 15, 2023, at 5:38 PM, Julian Huhn wrote: > On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 06:05:06PM +, Mike Larkin wrote: >>On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 04:34:20PM +0200, Julian Huhn wrote: >>> Since I got many DMARC rejection mails and therefore don't know how many >>> people this mail reached at all, once a

Re: High ACPI CPU load

2023-07-15 Thread Julian Huhn
On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 06:05:06PM +, Mike Larkin wrote: On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 04:34:20PM +0200, Julian Huhn wrote: Since I got many DMARC rejection mails and therefore don't know how many people this mail reached at all, once again with less restrictive DMARC settings. On Sat, Jul 15, 20

Re: High ACPI CPU load

2023-07-15 Thread Mike Larkin
On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 04:34:20PM +0200, Julian Huhn wrote: > Since I got many DMARC rejection mails and therefore don't know how many > people this mail reached at all, once again with less restrictive DMARC > settings. > > On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 02:28:56PM +0200, Julian Huhn wrote: > > Moin! >

Re: High ACPI CPU load

2023-07-15 Thread Julian Huhn
Since I got many DMARC rejection mails and therefore don't know how many people this mail reached at all, once again with less restrictive DMARC settings. On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 02:28:56PM +0200, Julian Huhn wrote: Moin! A few weeks ago, I put a new system into operation, where I notice a p

High ACPI CPU load

2023-07-15 Thread Julian Huhn
Moin! A few weeks ago, I put a new system into operation, where I notice a permanently high CPU load. With the help of top it appears that permanently the process acpi0 is executed. Is this a bug? I'm happy to help with more logs, if you tell me what you need. --Huhn # top -S load averages