On Nov 19, 2007 5:12 AM, Ray Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2007, at 3:34 PM, Siju George wrote:
> >
>
> > I know I cannot escape recompiling the kernel because it is necessary
> > for updates. But as far as possible I would like to stay away from it
> > on production machines :-
Nah, single disk is fine.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 01:12:29PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On 19/11/2007, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > sparc
> >
> > Preferable I'd like to see the testing using real disks.
>
> Do the slices need to be on different disks to make useful testing? I
>
On 19/11/2007, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sparc
>
> Preferable I'd like to see the testing using real disks.
Do the slices need to be on different disks to make useful testing? I
ask because my sparc(64) box has a single FCAL (Fibre Channel) disk,
and these things are not easy to
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 12:54:04AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Marco, what arch are you missing reports for now?
That is the best question to ask :-)
The arches that I want more testing on are:
alpha
armish
hp300
hppa
landisk
luna88k
ma68k
mvme68k
mvme88k
sgi
sparc
vax
zaurus
Preferable I'd
On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 05:04:53AM +0530, Siju George wrote:
> On Nov 18, 2007 7:46 PM, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 04:32:58AM +0530, Siju George wrote:
> > > Thank you so much
> > >
> >
> > Most of your questions are around rebuild or derivatives. This d
On 2007/11/19 10:27, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On 19/11/2007, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2007/11/19 05:04, Siju George wrote:
> > > One all the features in your mind has been implemented to softraid
> > > will it make RAIDFRAME redundant?
> >
> > This is all future stuff, I think
On 19/11/2007, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007/11/19 05:04, Siju George wrote:
> > One all the features in your mind has been implemented to softraid
> > will it make RAIDFRAME redundant?
>
> This is all future stuff, I think I'm right in saying that what's
> needed first and
On 2007/11/19 05:04, Siju George wrote:
> One all the features in your mind has been implemented to softraid
> will it make RAIDFRAME redundant?
This is all future stuff, I think I'm right in saying that what's
needed first and foremost is test reports for the less popular
machine architectures.
On Nov 18, 2007, at 3:34 PM, Siju George wrote:
I know I cannot escape recompiling the kernel because it is necessary
for updates. But as far as possible I would like to stay away from it
on production machines :-)
That's what releases are for.
Thanks a million for all the detailed answer
On Nov 18, 2007 7:46 PM, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 04:32:58AM +0530, Siju George wrote:
> > Thank you so much
> >
>
> Most of your questions are around rebuild or derivatives. This does not
> exist yet. My current push is to get softraid working on all a
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 04:32:58AM +0530, Siju George wrote:
> On Nov 17, 2007 12:04 AM, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'll take this as the documentation isn't good enough. Can you point me
> > to the area that isn't clear?
> >
>
> Thanks for the offer Marco.
> I currently use R
On Nov 17, 2007 12:04 AM, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll take this as the documentation isn't good enough. Can you point me
> to the area that isn't clear?
>
Thanks for the offer Marco.
I currently use RAIDFRAME for Raid 1
A few doubts that remain after I have read the man page
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 01:26:32PM -0700, Chris Cameron wrote:
> I thought the manpage was just covering things that worked well, and in
> the code itself were things waiting to be tested better. It shows a "3
> chunk raid 1" setup, but doesn't mention anything about hot standby. I'm
> not aware
I thought the manpage was just covering things that worked well, and in
the code itself were things waiting to be tested better. It shows a "3
chunk raid 1" setup, but doesn't mention anything about hot standby. I'm
not aware of 3 disk RAID 1 otherwise.
Also, for some reason (I think past misc
On 11/16/07, Chris Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm in a good position to test Softraid on an AMD and an UltraSPARC,
> however I've realized I don't know a lot about it (what -exactly- it's
> working to accomplish, and commands to use).
>
> Is there an overview of Softraid to get me started
I'll take this as the documentation isn't good enough. Can you point me
to the area that isn't clear?
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:29:20AM -0700, Chris Cameron wrote:
> I'm in a good position to test Softraid on an AMD and an UltraSPARC,
> however I've realized I don't know a lot about it (what -e
I'm in a good position to test Softraid on an AMD and an UltraSPARC,
however I've realized I don't know a lot about it (what -exactly- it's
working to accomplish, and commands to use).
Is there an overview of Softraid to get me started so I can be of some use?
Chris
17 matches
Mail list logo
