[EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit:
>Yes you're right but a "OpenHTTPD" with "OpenMOD_GZIP" and maybe IPv6 is
>still missing. And maybe a OpenSQUID... :-)))
>Just jokingoO(But httpD improvements would be realy cool. :) )
$ uname -a
OpenBSD jiyu.gnook.org 3.7 GENERIC#97 i386
Doing a $ cvs -qz1 -d [EMAIL
On 2005-05-03, at 2:12 PM, Sean Brown wrote:
be more to your liking? OpenOpenWall perhaps? OpenLinux?
^
Careful. A very vomit worthy company has a trademark on that one...
http://ir.sco.com/ReleaseDetail.cfm?ReleaseID=70727
Although, maybe not
On Monday, May 2, Sean Brown wrote:
>
> Is that for the stupid Open* suggestion or the fact it was Bash? Would
> OpenKDE be more to your liking? OpenOpenWall perhaps? OpenLinux?
Uuuggghhh!!!
Ok, I just want to drink beer and hack. The rest will take care
of itself.
--Toby.
> > > I'm looking forward to OpenBash
> >
> > Why do you want every OpenBSD developer to puke?
> >
> > Miod
> Is that for the stupid Open* suggestion or the fact it was Bash?
The latter.
Miod
On May 1, 2005 3:31 pm, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > I'm looking forward to OpenBash
>
> Why do you want every OpenBSD developer to puke?
>
> Miod
Is that for the stupid Open* suggestion or the fact it was Bash? Would OpenKDE
be more to your liking? OpenOpenWall perhaps? OpenLinux?
Steve Shockley wrote:
Sean Brown wrote:
I'm looking forward to OpenBash
If you keep saying things like that, Theo's going to change the default
shell back to csh.
what is this attraction to csh anyway?
cheers,
kim
--
Kim Hawtin : IT Systems Administrator
Ratbag : Level 8 - 63 Pirie Street Adelaide
Sean Brown wrote:
> I'm looking forward to OpenBash
Do you realize that on my only Linux machine I don't even have
bash installed. I replaced /bin/sh with ash and I use zsh for my
shell.
bash for Linux is like Internet Explorer for windows. It comes
preinstalled so everyone uses it and doesn't bo
> Sean Brown wrote:
>>I'm looking forward to OpenBash
>
> They already have it, it's called ksh.
Yes you're right but a "OpenHTTPD" with "OpenMOD_GZIP" and maybe IPv6 is
still missing. And maybe a OpenSQUID... :-)))
Just jokingoO(But httpD improvements would be realy cool. :) )
Kind regards,
Sean Brown wrote:
I'm looking forward to OpenBash
They already have it, it's called ksh.
_
Take charge with a pop-up guard built on patented Microsoft. SmartScreen
Technology.
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=
Thierry Deval wrote:
On May 1, 2005, at 23:31, Miod Vallat wrote:
I'm looking forward to OpenBash
I think they should write the ultimate virus! Take out Windows completely!
Think of it!; it would be the big bang all over again!
Alternately, I could live with mount_smbfs
(puts on flame retardant su
Sean Brown wrote:
I'm looking forward to OpenBash
If you keep saying things like that, Theo's going to change the default
shell back to csh.
On May 1, 2005, at 23:31, Miod Vallat wrote:
I'm looking forward to OpenBash
Why do you want every OpenBSD developer to puke?
Jeez, I didn't read that !
And it is indeed MY feeling. :p
> I'm looking forward to OpenBash
>
Why do you want every OpenBSD developer to puke?
Miod
On May 1, 2005 2:11 pm, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sun, 1 May 2005, Ben Goren wrote:
> > I did *not* say that I expected a Sendmail replacement any time
> > soon--quite the opposite. Let me put a definite limit on this: I'd bet
> > no more than (a modest) lunch, and only on the condition that I alre
Sorry If I didn't read to well, but when exactly is the hackaton planned?
I always like to have my personal hackaton at the same time and I
always watch every CVS commit.
Wijnand
On Sun, 1 May 2005, Ben Goren wrote:
> I did *not* say that I expected a Sendmail replacement any time
> soon--quite the opposite. Let me put a definite limit on this: I'd bet
> no more than (a modest) lunch, and only on the condition that I already
> happened to be in the same city when the be
On 2005 Apr 30, at 5:22 PM, Jeff Bachtel wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 02:30:28PM -0700, Ben Goren wrote:
>> As much as I'm sure Theo would love to get rid of gcc and
>> friends...damn, that's a big undertaking. I don't think it's the sort
>> of thing that would happen at a hackathon. If I had
A few promissing tasks indeed,
What ever endeavours you may embark on during the Hackathon, I hope
you find a nice beer buzz and as Jan Izary put it;
> Beyond that we can hope that someone has
> a moment of clarity and comes up with
> another sweet addition like spamd.
> If I wasn't sure develop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
:) Hah.
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 20:12:39 -0700 Raymond Lillard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Dear auto...
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Theo,
>>
>> Perhaps your a bit "ininformed" yourself.. unless the
ords fail to express correctly.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 9:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Hackathon 2005
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
Perhaps your a bit "ininformed" yourself.. unless there is some
weird canadian/US translation going on here, I am pretty sure that
the word you were looking for was infact, "uninformed". :)
Oh shit! Theo didn't proof read his e-mail! The two keys are right next to
each other man, no need to bug
Dear auto...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo,
Perhaps your a bit "ininformed" yourself.. unless there is some
weird canadian/US translation going on here, I am pretty sure that
the word you were looking for was infact, "uninformed". :)
Nor is there any su
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Theo,
Perhaps your a bit "ininformed" yourself.. unless there is some
weird canadian/US translation going on here, I am pretty sure that
the word you were looking for was infact, "uninformed". :)
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 19:03:01 -0700 Theo de Raadt
<[EMA
> > >> track and keep up to date another openbsd patch that sendmail won't
> > >> integrate into their tree. We already know that Postfix and qmail don't
>
> > Sorry for not being clear, but I was using it as an example. There are
> > many cases of organizations not accepting patches from the op
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005, Christopher Hylarides wrote:
>> An OpenSMTPd would surprise me, but it doesn't mean that as we write,
>> some
>> OpenBSD developer isn't just about to say "that does it!" with having to
>> track and keep up to date another openbsd patch that sendmail won't
>> integrate into
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005, Christopher Hylarides wrote:
> >> track and keep up to date another openbsd patch that sendmail won't
> >> integrate into their tree. We already know that Postfix and qmail don't
> Sorry for not being clear, but I was using it as an example. There are
> many cases of organ
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005, Christopher Hylarides wrote:
> An OpenSMTPd would surprise me, but it doesn't mean that as we write, some
> OpenBSD developer isn't just about to say "that does it!" with having to
> track and keep up to date another openbsd patch that sendmail won't
> integrate into their tr
> While I'm not a developer, I do beleive it scales reasonably well writing
> their own implementations.
Scaling isn't really our concern; I barely know what the word means.
There is one group of people who we do know scales.
Whiners. They scale really well.
> I don't have any point to make on the value of these
> projects, however "does this scale?"
How does it scale that we have to listen to your ininformed
gibberish day in day out?
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 02:30:28PM -0700, Ben Goren wrote:
> BTW, I just checked out the OpenCVS page. You know, it used to be that
> people would join a project and commit fixes or enhancements, rather
> than fork first and ask questions later. Is this really the best use
> of developer resource
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 19:22:48 -0500
Jeff Bachtel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, I just checked out the OpenCVS page. You know, it used to be that
> people would join a project and commit fixes or enhancements, rather
> than fork first and ask questions later. Is this really the best use
> of deve
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 02:30:28PM -0700, Ben Goren wrote:
> As much as I'm sure Theo would love to get rid of gcc and
> friends...damn, that's a big undertaking. I don't think it's the sort
> of thing that would happen at a hackathon. If I had to guess, it'd be
> made the main point of some fut
32 matches
Mail list logo
