On 2010-02-03, Giridhari wrote:
> I was very comfortable with pico, and nano. I am running a new system with
> multiprocessor kernel, and currently have no support for the ZTE MF626 modem I
> connect via cellular network with.
search the list archives for suggestions about the MF626.
the diff for
Hello,
While you're likely a troll, you may just be some sad religious zealot
ranting on a mailing list.
If you're not fond of vi(1), you may be interested in mg(1).. while it's
not exactly the same as pico or nano, it's not that far off.
Keep it off the lists next time,
-Bryan.
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Scott McEachern wrote:
> Giridhari wrote:
>
> blah blah
>>
>> pico or nano
>
> blah blah
>>
>> part of the distribution.
>
> and more blah blah blah.
>
> All that because you find 'pkg_add pico" or "pkg_add nano" too difficult to
> type?
>
> --
>
> -RSM
>
> http://
Giridhari wrote:
Hare Krsna.
From: Giridhari
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 7:37 AM
To: dera...@cvs.openbsd.org ; dera...@openbsd.org
Subject: Fw: pico and/or nano in the releases and snapshots
ATTENTION
Last night I saved a rat from certain death at the hands of a cat whose
ovaries had
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 07:06:49PM -0600, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> Wow this easily is the best troll of the year so far.
really? to me it looks like someone was trying to be funny and totally
failed. I give it a two thumbs down.
--
jake...@sdf.lonestar.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http:
Wow this easily is the best troll of the year so far.
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 10:52:32AM +1100, Giridhari wrote:
> Hare Krsna.
>
>
> From: Giridhari
> Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 7:37 AM
> To: dera...@cvs.openbsd.org ; dera...@openbsd.org
> Subject: Fw: pico and/or
;Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 7:37 AM
> >To: dera...@cvs.openbsd.org ; dera...@openbsd.org
> >Subject: Fw: pico and/or nano in the releases and snapshots
> >
> >
> >ATTENTION
> >
> >Last night I saved a rat from certain death at the hands of a cat wh
He's not asking you to do it, it is all up to the LordKrsna in this
case.
Mehma
===
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Scott McEachern wrote:
> Giridhari wrote:
>
> blah blah
>
>> pico or nano
>>
> blah blah
>
>> part of the distribution.
>>
> and more blah blah blah.
>
> All that because you
El 04/02/2010 0:52, Giridhari escribis:
Hare Krsna.
From: Giridhari
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 7:37 AM
To: dera...@cvs.openbsd.org ; dera...@openbsd.org
Subject: Fw: pico and/or nano in the releases and snapshots
ATTENTION
Last night I saved a rat from certain death at the hands of a
Giridhari wrote:
blah blah
pico or nano
blah blah
part of the distribution.
and more blah blah blah.
All that because you find 'pkg_add pico" or "pkg_add nano" too difficult
to type?
--
-RSM
http://www.erratic.ca
Hare Krsna.
From: Giridhari
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 7:37 AM
To: dera...@cvs.openbsd.org ; dera...@openbsd.org
Subject: Fw: pico and/or nano in the releases and snapshots
ATTENTION
Last night I saved a rat from certain death at the hands of a cat whose
ovaries had been cut out. This
11 matches
Mail list logo
