Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> Theo de Raadt writes:
> > Disagree on this.
> >
> > Those programs are intentionally not in the path, since you don't
> > run them by hand.
>
> That's what I was getting at. It's not clear they are 'libexec's.
> That's what confuses people. I just thought this might b
Theo de Raadt writes:
> Disagree on this.
>
> Those programs are intentionally not in the path, since you don't
> run them by hand.
That's what I was getting at. It's not clear they are 'libexec's.
That's what confuses people. I just thought this might be a way
to make it clear(er) that you don'
Disagree on this.
Those programs are intentionally not in the path, since you don't
run them by hand.
I think you are making a mountain out of a molehill.
Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> For programs that live in /usr/libexec, those with manpages show
> just the bare program name in the SYNOPSIS sec
For programs that live in /usr/libexec, those with manpages show
just the bare program name in the SYNOPSIS section (when there is
a SYNOPSIS section).
There is a long-standing expectation that programs documented in
section 8 of the manual can be run from a shell with /sbin:/usr/sbin
in the $PATH
4 matches
Mail list logo
