> Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:11:52 -0400
> From: Kurt Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Thursday 12 October 2006 10:13 am, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> > We are modifying the source code, which is ok with the "porting
> > software" paragraph in the document above, but contradicts with a
> > private mail f
On Friday 13 October 2006 04:25, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> Precisely which parts of the community-edition guidelines are you so
> strongly defending?
He is defending it? I could have sworn he only said OpenBSD is complying with
the guidelines.
---
Lars Hansson
On 12/10/06, Kurt Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... > http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/trademarks/community-edition-policy.html
OpenBSD is complying with the published guidelines for
the community edition. That is the only point that matters.
If the Mozilla Foundation thinks differently, I'
Henrik Enberg wrote:
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:11:52 -0400
From: Kurt Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thursday 12 October 2006 10:13 am, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
We are modifying the source code, which is ok with the "porting
software" paragraph in the document above, but contradicts with a
priva
On Thursday 12 October 2006 10:13 am, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> We are modifying the source code, which is ok with the "porting
> software" paragraph in the document above, but contradicts with a
> private mail from Mike Connor where he writes about patching of
> app source violates their trademark. Oh
On 12/10/06, RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David Sampson wrote:
> Due to the recent flair over the use of the Firefox logo, the GNU camp
> has decided to fork the entire project, into IceWeasel. The idea here
> is that they can't use the FF logo freely, so of course they must fork
> it. I
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 09:07:13AM -0400, Kurt Miller wrote:
> On Thursday 12 October 2006 4:57 am, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 10:19:45PM -0700, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > > On 10/11/06, David Sampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >AFAIK, no, but I was hoping to glean that infor
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 12:32:08 +0200
RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Sampson wrote:
> > Due to the recent flair over the use of the Firefox logo, the GNU
> > camp has decided to fork the entire project, into IceWeasel. The
> > idea here is that they can't use the FF logo freely, so of c
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 10:31 pm, David Sampson wrote:
> Due to the recent flair over the use of the Firefox logo, the GNU camp
> has decided to fork the entire project, into IceWeasel. The idea here
> is that they can't use the FF logo freely, so of course they must fork
> it. I just want t
On Thursday 12 October 2006 4:57 am, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 10:19:45PM -0700, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > On 10/11/06, David Sampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >AFAIK, no, but I was hoping to glean that information from the list...
> > >
> > >On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 23:31 -0500,
David Sampson wrote:
Due to the recent flair over the use of the Firefox logo, the GNU camp
has decided to fork the entire project, into IceWeasel. The idea here
is that they can't use the FF logo freely, so of course they must fork
it. I just want to know how this is going to affect the OpenBS
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 10:19:45PM -0700, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On 10/11/06, David Sampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >AFAIK, no, but I was hoping to glean that information from the list...
> >
> >On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 23:31 -0500, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> >> is someone planning on making a OpenBS
On 10/11/06, David Sampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AFAIK, no, but I was hoping to glean that information from the list...
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 23:31 -0500, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> is someone planning on making a OpenBSD port for IceWeasel?
and the point would be? what makes iceweasel a b
Hrrmpf. It seems like this goes against OpenBSD philosophy, but there
are many who know far more than I on this subject Maybe TDR hasn't
decided/thought about it, I don't know. I would like to continue to use
firefox under that name, and use the logo too, but it probably isn't as
simple as t
On 10/12/06, David Sampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Due to the recent flair over the use of the Firefox logo, the GNU camp
has decided to fork the entire project, into IceWeasel. The idea here
is that they can't use the FF logo freely, so of course they must fork
it. I just want to know how t
AFAIK, no, but I was hoping to glean that information from the list...
On Wed, 2006-10-11 at 23:31 -0500, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> is someone planning on making a OpenBSD port for IceWeasel?
>
> Sam Fourman Jr.
>
> On 10/11/06, David Sampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Due to the recent flair
Due to the recent flair over the use of the Firefox logo, the GNU camp
has decided to fork the entire project, into IceWeasel. The idea here
is that they can't use the FF logo freely, so of course they must fork
it. I just want to know how this is going to affect the OpenBSD camp,
if at all.
D
17 matches
Mail list logo
