On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 10:43:55AM -0800, Karsten McMinn wrote:
> On 11/1/06, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Additionally, as pointed out, it isn't enabled yet.
>
> I take you mean by default. I've playing with it and it
> seems to be doing something. I really should go
> read some
On 11/1/06, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Additionally, as pointed out, it isn't enabled yet.
I take you mean by default. I've playing with it and it
seems to be doing something. I really should go
read some of the diffs and tech@ to get an idea
where its being loaded. firefox run
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:26:37PM -0800, Karsten McMinn wrote:
> On 10/31/06, Berk D. Demir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Under 1 second... Even Firefox...
> >
> >I can not achieve similar even with prebind'ed binaries on an Athlon64
> >3500+ with more than 1GB empty DDR2 memory to scratch.
>
> I
> > is the new prebinding code in 4.0?
>
> The code is there. It is not being used by anything yet. There
> are things which need to be worked out.
and this stuff is documented in the ldconfig(8) manpage, see -P,
if you want to play.
> is the new prebinding code in 4.0?
The code is there. It is not being used by anything yet. There
are things which need to be worked out.
On 10/31/06, Berk D. Demir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Under 1 second... Even Firefox...
I can not achieve similar even with prebind'ed binaries on an Athlon64
3500+ with more than 1GB empty DDR2 memory to scratch.
I took a stopwatch to it and firefox is 2.5 seconds. In other words
it loads in
Karsten McMinn wrote:
apps are loading in under a second (including firefox) and with
the eye candy all turned on.
Under 1 second... Even Firefox...
I can not achieve similar even with prebind'ed binaries on an Athlon64
3500+ with more than 1GB empty DDR2 memory to scratch.
Good for you.
On 10/19/06, Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's true, but once everything is loaded and the system has been
running long enough to figure out what belongs in swap and what belongs
in memory, simple stuff shouldn't take too long. Simple stuff like
opening an xterm.
following up,
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 10:03:37AM +0530, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:42:45PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> > I'm not sure about KDE, but rxvt loads pretty fast (<10ms?) on ion. And
> > this is not exactly new hardware (neomagic driver, Thinkpad 390X).
> >
> > aterm
On 2006/10/19 10:03, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
> dillo is fast but useless. You can get the same thing with any of the
> console browsers like w3m,lynx,elinks etc...
anyone who hasn't tried w3m might have a surprise if they run
w3m-*-image in an xterm.
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:42:45PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> I'm not sure about KDE, but rxvt loads pretty fast (<10ms?) on ion. And
> this is not exactly new hardware (neomagic driver, Thinkpad 390X).
>
> aterm takes .5 seconds due to the transparent background, and dillo
> takes about 1 s
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 09:55:10AM -0700, Karsten McMinn wrote:
> On 10/18/06, Jeff Quast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Documentation is key!
> >
> >http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/CategoryHardwareChipset
> >http://www.xfree86.org/current/manindex4.html
> >
> >It took me about 30 minutes to find a
On 10/18/06, Karsten McMinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> in the other windows managers. I may be preaching to the
> choir, but for some reason after years of using X-apps/windows
> I just have to know if there a faster way to do xorg that I
> may have missed somewhere, some faq, some manpage,
> s
On 10/18/06, Karsten McMinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/18/06, Jeff Quast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Documentation is key!
>
> http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/CategoryHardwareChipset
> http://www.xfree86.org/current/manindex4.html
>
> It took me about 30 minutes to find a $30 ati card that
On 10/18/06, Jeff Quast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Documentation is key!
http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/CategoryHardwareChipset
http://www.xfree86.org/current/manindex4.html
It took me about 30 minutes to find a $30 ati card that is well
supported. The 9200 looks promising. I was able to find
On 10/17/06, Karsten McMinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to figure out what needs to be done in order to
get fast 2d xorg (and friends) performance. I term
fast as not having to wait for window operations, with
most every application and xorg opertation taking no longer
than 100ms. if an
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 02:37:32PM -0700, Karsten McMinn wrote:
> OpenBSD 3.9 (GENERIC) #617: Thu Mar 2 02:26:48 MST 2006
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
> cpu0: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.00GHz ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 2 GHz
> cpu0:
> FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE
On 10/17/06, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
do you mean if anyone experiences anything that bad? i've never had a
window operation take as long as 100ms even using the vesa driver.
the example closest to me at the moment is a desktop I work
on:
OpenBSD 3.9 (GENERIC) #617: Thu Mar 2 0
On 10/17/06, Karsten McMinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to figure out what needs to be done in order to
get fast 2d xorg (and friends) performance. I term
fast as not having to wait for window operations, with
most every application and xorg opertation taking no longer
than 100ms. if an
I'm trying to figure out what needs to be done in order to
get fast 2d xorg (and friends) performance. I term
fast as not having to wait for window operations, with
most every application and xorg opertation taking no longer
than 100ms. if anyone experiences this kind of
performance in any xorg en
20 matches
Mail list logo
